LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-34221: Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic)

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host prior to version 25.2.169 and Application prior to version 25.2.1518 (VA/SaaS deployments) expose every internal Docker container to the network because firewall rules allow unrestricted traffic to the Docker bridge network. Because no authentication, ACL or client‑side identifier is required, the attacker can interact with any internal API, bypassing the product’s authentication mechanisms entirely. The result is unauthenticated remote access to internal services, allowing credential theft, configuration manipulation and potential remote code execution. This vulnerability has been identified by the vendor as: V-2025-002 — Authentication Bypass - Docker Instances.

CriticalCVSS 10Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-34221 lets an unauthenticated network attacker reach internal Docker-hosted services in Vasion Print, bypassing normal product authentication. For organizations using affected Virtual Appliance or SaaS deployments, this can expose credentials, configuration, and potentially enable remote code execution.

Executive priority

Treat this as an immediate remediation item for any affected Vasion Print environment. The vulnerability bypasses authentication and can affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability across the print management platform.

Technical view

Affected Vasion Print Virtual Appliance Host versions before 25.2.169 and Application versions before 25.2.1518 allowed unrestricted traffic to the Docker bridge network. The issue is identified by Vasion as V-2025-002 and maps to CWE-306 authentication bypass, with CVSS 4.0 score 10.0.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where Vasion Print VA or SaaS components are network-reachable and below the fixed versions. Internet-facing or broadly reachable deployments carry the highest business risk.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The flaw is remotely reachable, unauthenticated, and documented publicly, so defenders should treat remediation as urgent.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports an authentication bypass caused by network exposure of internal Docker services. Public technical analysis exists, but this response intentionally avoids exploit workflow details. Confirm deployment mode and exact component versions before declaring exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Virtual Appliance Host to version 25.2.169 or later.
  • Upgrade Vasion Print Application to version 25.2.1518 or later.
  • Review Vasion VA and SaaS security bulletins for current vendor guidance.
  • Restrict network reachability to trusted administrative and application paths only.
  • Monitor for unusual access to internal services or unexpected configuration changes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Vasion Print VA and SaaS deployments.
  • Confirm Virtual Appliance Host and Application versions against fixed releases.
  • Review firewall policy for unintended Docker bridge or internal service exposure.
  • Check authentication and application logs for anomalous unauthenticated service access.
  • Validate remediation against the vendor security bulletins.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-306: Credential and account abuse lookup

Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-34221 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
10 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
10CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:HVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

10Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-34221Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
VasionPrint Virtual Appliance Host0unaffected
VasionPrint Application0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-306 · source CWE mapping

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

Missing Authentication for Critical Function represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.