LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-34037: Linksys Routers E/WAG/WAP/WES/WET/WRT-Series

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in various models of E-Series Linksys routers via the /tmUnblock.cgi and /hndUnblock.cgi endpoints over HTTP on port 8080. The CGI scripts improperly process user-supplied input passed to the ttcp_ip parameter without sanitization, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject shell commands. This vulnerability was reported to be exploited in the wild by the "TheMoon" worm  in 2014 to deploy a MIPS ELF payload, enabling arbitrary code execution on the router. Additionally, this vulnerability may affect other Linksys products to include, but not limited to, WAG/WAP/WES/WET/WRT-series router models and Wireless-N access points and routers. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-02-06 UTC.

CriticalCVSS 10Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets an unauthenticated attacker run operating-system commands on affected Linksys routers through exposed HTTP CGI endpoints. For a business, the main concern is takeover of edge network devices, which can enable malware, traffic interception, outages, or pivoting into internal networks.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as urgent for any organization using legacy Linksys edge devices. The vulnerability is unauthenticated, network-reachable, rated CVSS 10, and has historical worm exploitation plus later observed exploitation evidence.

Technical view

CVE-2025-34037 is CWE-78 command injection in /tmUnblock.cgi and /hndUnblock.cgi on HTTP port 8080. Unsanitized ttcp_ip input can allow unauthenticated remote code execution. Sources cite Linksys E-series models and possible WAG/WAP/WES/WET/WRT and Wireless-N products, but affected-product evidence is broad and partly incomplete.

Likely exposure

Highest risk is legacy Linksys routers or access points with HTTP management on port 8080 reachable from the internet or untrusted networks. The source bundle names several E-series models and says other Linksys product families may also be affected, but exact firmware scope is not fully established.

Exploitation context

The source bundle reports in-the-wild exploitation by TheMoon worm in 2014 and exploitation evidence observed by Shadowserver on 2025-02-06 UTC. It is not marked as CISA KEV in the provided data, so treat current exploitation status as evidenced but not KEV-confirmed.

Researcher notes

The public record supports command injection through ttcp_ip on two CGI endpoints, but product and firmware boundaries remain imprecise. Avoid assuming every Linksys router is affected; validate model, firmware, management exposure, and logs before scoping remediation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Linksys E-series, WAG, WAP, WES, WET, WRT, and Wireless-N devices.
  • Block internet access to router management interfaces, especially HTTP port 8080.
  • Disable remote administration where it is not strictly required.
  • Check Linksys or vendor guidance for firmware updates or replacement recommendations.
  • Replace unsupported devices that cannot receive security fixes.
  • Monitor perimeter telemetry for requests to the named CGI endpoints.

Validation and detection

  • Search asset inventories for the listed Linksys model families.
  • Confirm whether HTTP port 8080 is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review logs for requests to /tmUnblock.cgi or /hndUnblock.cgi.
  • Inspect security telemetry for suspicious ttcp_ip parameter activity.
  • Verify firmware status against vendor guidance, where available.
  • Check for unexpected MIPS ELF binaries or persistence on exposed devices.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-34037 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
10 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
10CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:HVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

10Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-34037Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinksysE42000unaffected
LinksysE32000unaffected
LinksysE30000unaffected
LinksysE2500 v1/v20unaffected
LinksysE2100L v10unaffected
LinksysE20000unaffected
LinksysE15500unaffected
LinksysE1500 v10unaffected
LinksysE1200 v10unaffected
LinksysE1000 v10unaffected
LinksysE900 v10unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.