LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-3359: Gnuplot: segmentation fault via io_str_init_static_internal function

A flaw was found in GNUPlot. A segmentation fault via IO_str_init_static_internal may jeopardize the environment.

MediumCVSS 6.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-3359 is a gnuplot flaw that can cause a segmentation fault, disrupting availability of the local process. Red Hat rates it medium. The business impact is mainly denial of service where gnuplot is installed or used in workflows that process data locally.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate availability issue. Prioritize environments where gnuplot supports reporting, scientific, engineering, or automated data-processing workflows. It is not currently supported by the sources as an actively exploited or data-compromise vulnerability.

Technical view

The issue is described as a segmentation fault in IO_str_init_static_internal, mapped to CWE-754. CVSS 3.1 is 6.2 with local attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and high availability impact only. Red Hat lists RHEL 7 and 8 gnuplot as affected; RHEL 6 status is unknown.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Linux systems with gnuplot installed, especially Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and 8 according to Red Hat’s affected list. Systems without gnuplot, or where it is not reachable by local users or automated jobs, have lower practical exposure.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show active exploitation, public weaponization, or CISA KEV listing. The CVSS vector indicates local exploitation affecting availability, not remote code execution or data theft. Practical risk increases if untrusted local inputs are processed by gnuplot in automated pipelines.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to vendor and issue-tracking descriptions. The sources identify the crash location and availability impact but do not provide a named fixed version in the supplied bundle. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond local denial of service unless vendor details expand.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Red Hat and gnuplot guidance for fixed package availability.
  • Prioritize updates on RHEL 7 and 8 systems running gnuplot.
  • Limit gnuplot processing of untrusted inputs where feasible.
  • Monitor vendor advisories for RHEL 6 status clarification.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems with the gnuplot package installed.
  • Map installed gnuplot instances to RHEL 7 and 8 exposure.
  • Review vendor advisories for package status and fixes.
  • Check crash logs for gnuplot segmentation faults referencing IO_str_init_static_internal.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-754: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-3359 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.2CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.53.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.2Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-3359Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorgnuplotgnuplot, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6gnuplotunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7gnuplotaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gnuplotaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-754 · source CWE mapping

Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions

Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.