CVE-2025-32988: Gnutls: vulnerability in gnutls othername san export
A flaw was found in GnuTLS. A double-free vulnerability exists in GnuTLS due to incorrect ownership handling in the export logic of Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries containing an otherName. If the type-id OID is invalid or malformed, GnuTLS will call asn1_delete_structure() on an ASN.1 node it does not own, leading to a double-free condition when the parent function or caller later attempts to free the same structure.
This vulnerability can be triggered using only public GnuTLS APIs and may result in denial of service or memory corruption, depending on allocator behavior.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
GnuTLS can mishandle a malformed certificate Subject Alternative Name and free the same memory twice. Affected software may crash or suffer memory corruption while processing the entry. The supplied assessment rates it CVSS 6.5: serious for availability, but exploitation requires a higher-complexity condition and no confidentiality impact is identified.
Executive priority
Schedule remediation promptly within the normal vulnerability cycle, accelerating internet-facing and business-critical certificate-processing services. The principal business risk is service disruption. Broader compromise is not established by the supplied evidence, and active exploitation is not reported.
Technical view
Incorrect ownership handling in GnuTLS otherName SAN export causes an ASN.1 node to be freed despite not being owned by that function. Later cleanup can free it again. Public GnuTLS APIs can trigger the flaw using an invalid or malformed type-id OID, potentially causing denial of service or allocator-dependent memory corruption.
Likely exposure
Exposure exists where affected GnuTLS packages or Red Hat products process and export certificates containing otherName SAN entries. The bundle identifies affected RHEL 8, 9, 10, OpenShift 4, Ceph Storage 7, and several containers. RHEL 6 and 7 status remains unknown.
Exploitation context
The CVSS vector describes network reachability, no privileges or user interaction, and high attack complexity. The bundle reports denial of service or memory corruption, but provides no evidence of active exploitation; it is not listed in KEV. No confidentiality impact is asserted.
Researcher notes
CWE-415 applies. Triggerability through public APIs broadens the potentially affected application surface, but practical reachability depends on whether an application invokes the vulnerable SAN export path on attacker-influenced certificates. Allocator behavior determines whether the observed result is a crash or memory corruption. The bundle does not establish code execution.
Mitigation direction
Apply the relevant Red Hat security advisory updates for each affected platform and package.
Check GnuTLS and downstream vendor guidance for products not explicitly covered by the listed advisories.
Prioritize externally reachable or availability-critical services that process untrusted certificates.
Restart or redeploy dependent services after updating, following vendor operational guidance.
Validation and detection
Inventory installed GnuTLS packages, containers, and applications linked to the library.
Compare package versions against the applicable Red Hat advisory for each supported product stream.
Identify services that export or inspect otherName SAN certificate entries.
Confirm updated services loaded the corrected library after restart or redeployment.
Monitor affected services for crashes or memory-corruption signals during certificate processing.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-415: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.