LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-32908: Libsoup: denial of service on libsoup through http/2 server

A flaw was found in libsoup. The HTTP/2 server in libsoup may not fully validate the values of pseudo-headers :scheme, :authority, and :path, which may allow a user to cause a denial of service (DoS).

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-32908 is a denial-of-service flaw in libsoup's HTTP/2 server handling. A remote, unauthenticated user may be able to make a vulnerable service unavailable by sending invalid HTTP/2 pseudo-header values. The documented impact is availability loss, not data theft or code execution.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority availability risk for exposed services, especially on RHEL 10. It does not indicate data compromise, but downtime could affect customer-facing or operational systems. Patch affected packages through vendor channels and validate where libsoup server functionality is actually used.

Technical view

libsoup's HTTP/2 server may not fully validate the :scheme, :authority, and :path pseudo-headers. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.5, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where libsoup is used as an HTTP/2 server and is reachable over a network. The bundle identifies Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 libsoup3 version 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0 as affected, RHEL 7-9 as unaffected, and RHEL 6 as unknown.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The issue appears remotely reachable and unauthenticated based on the CVSS vector, but the source bundle does not provide exploit details or evidence of exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for the affected Red Hat package and the pseudo-header validation flaw. The bundle references GNOME issue and merge request but does not include fixed version details. Avoid assuming client-only libsoup usage is exploitable without confirming HTTP/2 server exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply the Red Hat advisory update for affected RHEL 10 libsoup3 systems.
  • Check GNOME libsoup and distribution guidance for fixed upstream or backported packages.
  • Prioritize services using libsoup as an HTTP/2 server and exposed to untrusted networks.
  • Restrict network access to affected HTTP/2 services where patching is delayed.
  • Monitor service availability for crashes or repeated abnormal HTTP/2 requests.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems with libsoup or libsoup3 installed.
  • Identify applications using libsoup HTTP/2 server functionality.
  • Confirm whether installed RHEL 10 libsoup3 matches 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.
  • Verify RHEL 7-9 systems are not carrying unsupported vulnerable backports.
  • Record RHEL 6 status as unknown until vendor guidance confirms exposure.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-115: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-32908 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-32908Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorlibsouplibsoup, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10libsoup3, 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6libsoupunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7libsoupunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libsoupunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libsoupunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-115 · source CWE mapping

Misinterpretation of Input

Misinterpretation of Input represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.