LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-32563: WordPress WP Calais Auto Tagger plugin <= 2.0 - CSRF to Stored XSS vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in dangrossman WP Calais Auto Tagger calais-auto-tagger allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Calais Auto Tagger: from n/a through <= 2.0.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This affects WordPress sites using WP Calais Auto Tagger version 2.0 or earlier. A successful attack could trick an authenticated user into causing stored script content in the site, creating confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The sources rate it high severity, but do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure if the plugin is present. Prioritize inventory first; if affected installations exist, reduce exposure quickly because stored XSS can damage visitor trust and site integrity.

Technical view

CVE-2025-32563 is a CSRF issue in dangrossman WP Calais Auto Tagger, reported as CSRF to stored XSS, affecting versions through 2.0. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.1 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and required user interaction. No fixed version is provided in the supplied sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress installations where the calais-auto-tagger plugin is installed at version 2.0 or earlier. The bundle does not establish exposure for other WordPress plugins, themes, or core WordPress.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability requires user interaction and is not listed as CISA KEV in the supplied data. The public bundle describes the vulnerability class and impact but does not provide evidence of active exploitation, public exploit availability, or observed campaigns.

Researcher notes

The source data identifies CWE-352 and describes CSRF leading to stored XSS, but does not include patch details, exploit telemetry, or proof-of-concept status. Avoid assuming broader product impact or a fixed release until vendor or database guidance states it.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for WP Calais Auto Tagger installations.
  • Disable or remove affected versions until vendor guidance confirms a safe path.
  • Check Patchstack and CVE records for fixed-version or workaround updates.
  • Restrict WordPress administrative access to trusted users and sessions.
  • Review recent site content changes for unexpected injected script content.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether calais-auto-tagger is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record installed plugin versions and flag versions 2.0 or earlier.
  • Review plugin settings and affected content areas for unexpected changes.
  • Check logs for unusual authenticated administrative actions.
  • Track CVE and Patchstack updates for remediation changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-32563 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-32563Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
dangrossmanWP Calais Auto Taggercalais-auto-tagger, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.