Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-32394 is a denial-of-service issue in AutoGPT before version 0.6.32. A malicious authenticated user can submit input that causes the AITextSummarizerBlock to consume excessive memory, potentially exhausting server resources and disrupting service.
Executive priority
Treat this as a moderate operational risk. Prioritize patching internet-accessible or multi-user AutoGPT deployments because the likely business impact is service disruption, not data theft.
Technical view
AutoGPT AITextSummarizerBlock before 0.6.32 improperly controls resource consumption. The advisory describes input amplification where relatively small user content can trigger very large memory use. CVSS 4.0 is 5.3, with network access, low attack complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and low availability impact.
Likely exposure
Organizations running Significant-Gravitas AutoGPT versions earlier than 0.6.32 are potentially exposed, especially where untrusted or semi-trusted users can access workflows using AITextSummarizerBlock.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires low privileges and targets availability rather than confidentiality or integrity.
Researcher notes
The public details identify CWE-405 and CWE-770 resource-consumption weaknesses. Evidence is limited to the CVE record and GitHub advisory. Do not assume broader AutoGPT components are affected beyond AITextSummarizerBlock unless vendor guidance expands scope.
Mitigation direction
- Upgrade AutoGPT to version 0.6.32 or later.
- Review vendor advisory GHSA-955p-gpfx-r66j for current guidance.
- Restrict access to AutoGPT workflows from untrusted users where possible.
- Monitor memory usage and service stability on affected deployments.
Validation and detection
- Identify deployed AutoGPT versions and confirm whether any are below 0.6.32.
- Inventory workflows using AITextSummarizerBlock.
- Check authentication and authorization around users who can submit summarization inputs.
- Review logs and monitoring for unexplained memory exhaustion or service restarts.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-405: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCWE-770: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2025-32394 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 5.3 (4.0)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——GitHub_MVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 4.0 score
5.3MediumVector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/security/advisories/GHSA-955p-gpfx-r66jCVE reference, GitHub_M · x_refsource_CONFIRM
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)
Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.