LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-32053: Libsoup: heap buffer overflows in sniff_feed_or_html() and skip_insignificant_space()

A flaw was found in libsoup. A vulnerability in sniff_feed_or_html() and skip_insignificant_space() functions may lead to a heap buffer over-read.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-32053 is a libsoup memory-read flaw that can expose limited data or disrupt affected software. It is rated medium, not known exploited in the provided sources, and matters most where systems process untrusted web content through libsoup.

Executive priority

Treat as a normal patch-cycle issue unless libsoup is exposed in services processing untrusted web content at scale. There is no provided evidence of active exploitation, but the network vector and no-auth conditions justify timely remediation.

Technical view

The flaw is a heap buffer over-read in libsoup's sniff_feed_or_html() and skip_insignificant_space() functions, classified as CWE-126. CVSS 3.1 is 6.5 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, limited confidentiality impact, and limited availability impact.

Likely exposure

Source data names affected Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, 8.8 EUS, 9, 9.2 EUS, and 9.4 EUS libsoup packages. RHEL 10 libsoup3 is listed unaffected. RHEL 6 and 7 status is unknown. A Debian LTS advisory is also referenced.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV inclusion or cite active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates remote reachability without authentication or user interaction, but practical exposure depends on applications that pass attacker-controlled content into affected libsoup parsing paths.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports a heap over-read in specific libsoup functions, with limited confidentiality and availability impacts. The bundle does not provide exploit details, proof-of-concept status, or complete cross-distro affected-version coverage, so validation should stay tied to vendor advisories.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply the relevant Red Hat security advisory for affected RHEL streams.
  • Review the Debian LTS advisory if running Debian LTS packages.
  • Check GNOME/libsoup upstream issue guidance for project-level remediation context.
  • Prioritize systems that process untrusted web or feed content through libsoup.
  • If no vendor fix is available, follow vendor-recommended compensating controls.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory hosts and containers for libsoup, libsoup3, and vendor-packaged dependencies.
  • Compare installed package streams against the affected Red Hat entries in the source bundle.
  • Confirm applicable RHSA or Debian LTS updates are installed through standard patch reporting.
  • Identify applications that use libsoup to fetch or sniff untrusted network content.
  • Document exceptions where RHEL 6 or 7 status remains unknown.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
12

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-126: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-32053 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
11Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L3.92.5redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-32053Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorlibsouplibsoup, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libsoup, 0:2.62.3-8.el8_10affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8mingw-freetype, 0:2.8-3.el8_10.1affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8spice-client-win, 0:8.10-1affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libsoup, 0:2.62.3-8.el8_10affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Supportlibsoup, 0:2.62.3-3.el8_8.4affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libsoup, 0:2.72.0-10.el9_6.1affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Supportlibsoup, 0:2.72.0-8.el9_2.4affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Supportlibsoup, 0:2.72.0-8.el9_4.4affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10libsoup3unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6libsoupunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7libsoupunknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-126 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Over-read

Buffer Over-read represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.