LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-32051: Libsoup: segmentation fault when parsing malformed data uri

A flaw was found in libsoup. The libsoup soup_uri_decode_data_uri() function may crash when processing malformed data URI. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS).

MediumCVSS 5.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-32051 is a denial-of-service flaw in libsoup. A malformed data URI can make the library crash, potentially taking down an application that relies on it. The available sources do not show data theft, code execution, or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate availability risk. It is not currently evidenced as exploited or confidentiality-impacting, but services that parse untrusted data URIs should be checked because a crash can still affect uptime.

Technical view

The flaw is in libsoup's soup_uri_decode_data_uri() handling of malformed data URIs, leading to a segmentation fault. CVSS 3.1 is 5.9 with network attack vector, high complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and availability impact only. CWE-754 is listed.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in applications that use libsoup and process untrusted data URIs. Red Hat lists RHEL 8, 9, and 10 as unaffected for the relevant packages, while RHEL 6 and 7 status is unknown in the bundle.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not indicate active exploitation, and KEV is false. Exploitation would require malformed data URI input reaching the vulnerable parsing path. The CVSS vector rates attack complexity as high and impact as availability-only.

Researcher notes

The source evidence describes a crash in soup_uri_decode_data_uri() but does not provide complete affected upstream version ranges or a named fixed release. Red Hat marks several enterprise versions unaffected and older versions unknown, so validation should be package-specific.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Red Hat and upstream GNOME guidance for package status and fixes.
  • Inventory applications and packages that depend on libsoup or libsoup3.
  • Prioritize review of internet-facing services that parse untrusted data URIs.
  • Update affected packages when vendor-supported fixes become available.
  • Monitor crash loops or segmentation faults in libsoup-linked services.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed OS versions and libsoup package names against vendor status.
  • Identify services or applications linking against libsoup or libsoup3.
  • Review whether those services accept untrusted data URI input.
  • Check application logs for crashes around URI or data URI parsing.
  • Track Red Hat Bugzilla and GNOME issue updates for confirmed affected versions.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-754: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-32051 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.23.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-32051Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorlibsouplibsoup, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10libsoup3unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6libsoupunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7libsoupunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libsoupunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libsoupunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-754 · source CWE mapping

Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions

Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.