LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-31936: Improper handling of overlap between protected memory ranges for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processors when us...

Improper handling of overlap between protected memory ranges for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processors when using Intel(R) TDX within SMM may allow an escalation of privilege. SMM adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.

HighCVSS 7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability affects some Intel Xeon 6 systems using Intel TDX. Under demanding conditions, an attacker who already has privileged local access and control within System Management Mode could compromise protected information or its integrity. Exploitation is complex, requires special internal knowledge, and needs no user interaction.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority platform issue where Xeon 6 and TDX protect sensitive or multi-tenant workloads. First establish exposure, then follow Intel and system-vendor remediation guidance. Systems without the specified processor and TDX configuration are not demonstrated as affected by the supplied evidence.

Technical view

Overlapping protected memory ranges are handled improperly when Intel TDX operates within SMM on affected Xeon 6 processors. A highly privileged SMM adversary may cross a protection boundary, causing high confidentiality and integrity impact. The supplied CVSS 4.0 score is 7.0; availability impact is not identified.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to specified Intel Xeon 6 processors using Intel TDX under the vulnerable SMM conditions. Exact processor models and affected versions are not included in the supplied bundle and must be confirmed against Intel advisory INTEL-SA-01379.

Exploitation context

The supplied evidence does not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle. Exploitation requires local access, high privileges, high complexity, additional attack conditions, SMM capability, and special internal knowledge. These prerequisites reduce likelihood but not potential impact.

Researcher notes

CWE-1260 concerns improper handling of overlap between protected memory ranges. The stated boundary failure occurs within SMM while using TDX. Exact vulnerable models, firmware dependencies, remediation versions, and detection indicators are absent from the bundle; consult Intel's advisory before drawing product-specific conclusions.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Intel advisory INTEL-SA-01379 for affected processor models and vendor-approved remediation.
  • Apply Intel or system-vendor updates identified by the advisory after appropriate testing.
  • Restrict privileged local access and tightly control administrative pathways to affected hosts.
  • Prioritize systems using TDX for sensitive workloads or tenant isolation.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Intel Xeon 6 processor models across physical hosts.
  • Determine whether Intel TDX is enabled and actively used on each host.
  • Compare processor and platform versions with Intel advisory INTEL-SA-01379.
  • Verify recommended Intel or system-vendor updates are installed.
  • Review privileged-access records for unexpected local or platform-administration activity.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1260: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-31936 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:Nintel

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-31936Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aIntel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processors when using Intel(R) TDXSee referencesunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1260 · source CWE mapping

Improper Handling of Overlap Between Protected Memory Ranges

Improper Handling of Overlap Between Protected Memory Ranges represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.