LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-31839: WordPress Footer Contacts Bar plugin <= 1.8 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in digireturn DN Footer Contacts dn-footer-contacts allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DN Footer Contacts: from n/a through <= 1.8.1.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a CSRF flaw in the WordPress DN Footer Contacts plugin. A logged-in site administrator could be tricked into causing an unintended low-impact change if they visit attacker-controlled content. The sources do not describe data theft, service outage, or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Handle during the next routine WordPress maintenance cycle unless the plugin manages sensitive business content or high-trust public contact workflows. Prioritize inventory first because impact appears limited but depends on plugin deployment.

Technical view

CVE-2025-31839 is CWE-352 in digireturn DN Footer Contacts, package dn-footer-contacts, affecting versions through 1.8.1 per the CVE description. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, low integrity impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites that have the DN Footer Contacts plugin installed at an affected version. Sites without this plugin are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not report known exploitation, and KEV status is false. Exploitation requires user interaction, likely involving a privileged WordPress user being induced to perform an unintended request.

Researcher notes

Source detail is sparse: the public bundle names CSRF, affected plugin, CVSS vector, and Patchstack reference, but does not describe the exact vulnerable action or a named fixed version. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond low integrity impact and required user interaction.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the DN Footer Contacts plugin.
  • Check vendor or Patchstack guidance for a fixed version or official workaround.
  • Update the plugin if a maintained fixed release is available.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is not business-critical.
  • Restrict administrative access and reinforce anti-phishing controls for WordPress administrators.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether dn-footer-contacts is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record installed plugin versions and flag versions through 1.8.1.
  • Review available WordPress logs for unexpected plugin-related changes.
  • Verify vendor guidance before marking remediation complete.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-31839 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-31839Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
digireturnDN Footer Contactsdn-footer-contacts, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.