Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-31602 is a CSRF issue in the WordPress Apimo Connector plugin. A tricked administrator could unintentionally make a low-impact settings change. The reported severity is medium, with low integrity impact and no confidentiality or availability impact in the provided CVSS data.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate-priority WordPress hygiene issue. It is not documented as exploited, but affected sites should be inventoried and remediated because administrator-driven settings changes can still create business risk.
Technical view
The source bundle describes CWE-352 CSRF in Proptech Plugin Apimo Connector, package apimo, affecting versions through 2.6.5.1. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, unchanged scope, integrity low.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites with Apimo Connector installed at a vulnerable version through 2.6.5.1. The bundle contains incomplete affected-version metadata, so verify plugin presence and exact version locally.
Exploitation context
The bundle does not identify active exploitation, and KEV is false. Exploitation requires user interaction, likely involving an authenticated administrator being induced to perform an unintended settings-changing request.
Researcher notes
Evidence is limited to the CVE bundle and Patchstack reference. The title reports through 2.6.5.1, while the Patchstack URL text mentions 2.6.3.1, so version impact should be confirmed before broad claims.
Mitigation direction
Inventory WordPress sites for the Apimo Connector plugin and record installed versions.
Check vendor, WordPress.org, and Patchstack guidance for a fixed release before deciding upgrade timing.
If the plugin is not required, disable or remove it from affected sites.
Restrict administrator sessions and avoid clicking untrusted links while exposure remains.
After remediation, review plugin settings for unauthorized changes.
Validation and detection
Confirm whether Apimo Connector is installed and whether its version is within the reported affected range.
Review administrative settings changes for unexpected Apimo Connector modifications.
Verify current plugin code or vendor notes indicate CSRF protections on settings-changing actions.
Track Patchstack and CVE updates for clarified affected versions or fixed-release details.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-352 · source CWE mapping
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.