LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-31538: WordPress Checklist plugin <= 1.1.9 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in checklistcom Checklist checklist allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Checklist: from n/a through <= 1.1.9.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-31538 is a stored cross-site scripting issue in the WordPress Checklist plugin through version 1.1.9. A user with some level of access could save content that runs in another user’s browser when viewed. Business impact is moderate because exploitation needs privileges and user interaction, but could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority WordPress plugin risk. It does not have provided evidence of active exploitation, but stored XSS can affect administrator sessions and site trust if an affected plugin remains deployed.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-79 improper input neutralization during page generation in checklistcom Checklist for WordPress, affecting versions through 1.1.9. CVSS 3.1 is 6.5 with AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, indicating network reachability, low complexity, low privileges, required user interaction, and changed scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running the Checklist plugin version 1.1.9 or earlier. Sites without this plugin, or not using affected versions, are not indicated as exposed by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires low privileges and user interaction, so this is not described as unauthenticated remote compromise.

Researcher notes

Available evidence identifies the vulnerability class, affected product, affected version range, and CVSS vector. The bundle does not provide the affected parameter, sink, proof of concept, fixed version, or confirmed exploitation, so validation should stay defensive and source-bounded.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Checklist plugin and installed version.
  • Check vendor or Patchstack guidance for a fixed release or official mitigation.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if it is unnecessary or cannot be safely updated.
  • Restrict plugin-related authoring or administrative permissions to trusted users.
  • Monitor WordPress activity for unexpected content or configuration changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Checklist is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and compare it with the affected range.
  • Review user roles that can create or modify Checklist-related content.
  • Check recent WordPress logs for suspicious content changes or admin activity.
  • Verify remediation against vendor or Patchstack guidance when available.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-31538 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.33.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-31538Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
checklistcomChecklistchecklist, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.