LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-31414: WordPress Cost Calculator Builder plugin <= 3.2.65 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Stylemix Cost Calculator Builder cost-calculator-builder allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Cost Calculator Builder: from n/a through <= 3.2.65.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-31414 is a stored cross-site scripting issue in the WordPress Cost Calculator Builder plugin through version 3.2.65. A logged-in attacker could store unsafe content that runs when another user views it, potentially affecting data, page integrity, or site operations.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate web application risk. Prioritize remediation for public WordPress sites, sites with many contributor accounts, or sites where administrators regularly view user-controlled calculator content.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-79 improper input neutralization during web page generation in Stylemix Cost Calculator Builder. CVSS 3.1 is 6.5 with network access, low complexity, low privileges, required user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites using Cost Calculator Builder version 3.2.65 or earlier, especially where non-administrators can create or edit calculator-related content viewed by staff or visitors.

Exploitation context

The supplied sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation is described only as stored XSS requiring low privileges and user interaction; no public exploit details are provided in the bundle.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description, CVSS vector, and Patchstack vulnerability listing. The bundle does not identify a specific vulnerable parameter, proof of concept, exploit activity, or fixed version.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Cost Calculator Builder installations and versions.
  • Check Stylemix or Patchstack guidance for a fixed version or vendor mitigation.
  • Upgrade affected plugin instances when vendor guidance identifies a safe release.
  • Restrict calculator editing permissions to trusted users until remediated.
  • Disable the plugin where business impact is acceptable and no fix is available.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Cost Calculator Builder is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record plugin versions and flag any instance at 3.2.65 or earlier.
  • Review roles allowed to create or edit calculator content.
  • Check recent calculator content changes for unexpected scripts or markup.
  • Verify remediation by confirming the plugin is no longer in the affected version range.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-31414 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.33.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-31414Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
StylemixCost Calculator Buildercost-calculator-builder, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.