Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-31395 affects the WordPress Easy Custom CSS plugin through version 1.0. A malicious site could abuse a user’s browser interaction to make stored script content persist in WordPress. The public bundle does not show active exploitation or a named fixed version.
Executive priority
Treat as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure review. The business risk is website compromise through stored XSS, but urgency is below emergency level because no active exploitation is cited in the provided sources.
Technical view
The issue is reported as CWE-352 CSRF leading to stored XSS in a.ankit Easy Custom CSS <=1.0. CVSS 3.1 is 7.1 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, required user interaction, and changed scope.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to WordPress sites that have the Easy Custom CSS plugin installed at version 1.0 or earlier. The bundle does not identify affected hosting platforms beyond WordPress plugin deployments.
Exploitation context
The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle. Available evidence supports theoretical or publicly disclosed risk, not confirmed active exploitation. User interaction is part of the CVSS vector.
Researcher notes
Evidence is sparse: the bundle provides CVE metadata, CVSS, CWE-352, affected plugin/version, and one Patchstack reference. It does not provide exploit details, proof of exploitation, or a confirmed patch version.
Mitigation direction
Inventory WordPress sites for the easy-custom-css plugin and version.
Check vendor and Patchstack guidance for a fixed release or workaround.
Disable or remove the plugin where no safe guidance is available.
Limit WordPress administrative access to trusted users and devices.
Monitor site content changes for unexpected stored script behavior.
Validation and detection
Confirm whether Easy Custom CSS is installed on each WordPress site.
Record installed plugin versions and flag versions <=1.0.
Review WordPress audit logs for unexpected plugin setting changes.
Check public pages for unauthorized persistent script content.
Track CVE and Patchstack entries for updated remediation details.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-352 · source CWE mapping
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.