LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-31178: Gnuplot: gnuplot segmentation fault on getannotatestring

A flaw was found in gnuplot. The GetAnnotateString() function may lead to a segmentation fault and cause a system crash.

MediumCVSS 6.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-31178 is a gnuplot flaw where processing in GetAnnotateString() can trigger a segmentation fault. The documented impact is a crash, so the business concern is availability rather than data theft or privilege escalation. Public sources do not show active exploitation or a named patch in the provided record.

Executive priority

Schedule normal vulnerability management review, with higher priority for environments where gnuplot failures could interrupt reporting, scientific processing, monitoring, or batch jobs. Current public evidence supports availability risk, not compromise of confidentiality or integrity.

Technical view

The issue is classified as CWE-476, NULL pointer dereference. CVSS 3.1 is 6.2 with local attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and high availability impact only. Red Hat tracks possible exposure for RHEL 6, 7, and 8 gnuplot packages, with status shown as unknown in the bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where gnuplot is installed and can process local files or inputs from users, workflows, or automation. The provided data does not confirm specific vulnerable upstream versions beyond the gnuplot package entry, and Red Hat product status is listed as unknown.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates local exploitation and a crash outcome. There is no KEV listing and no cited source in the bundle claiming active exploitation. Treat this as a denial-of-service risk for systems or pipelines depending on gnuplot availability.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to CVE, Red Hat tracking, Bugzilla, and SourceForge references. The bundle names GetAnnotateString() and segmentation fault but does not include a confirmed affected version range or remediation commit. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond local denial of service.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory systems and containers with gnuplot installed.
  • Check Red Hat and gnuplot guidance for fixed packages or advisories.
  • Limit gnuplot processing of untrusted local inputs where practical.
  • Prioritize updates for systems where gnuplot supports production workflows.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed gnuplot package versions across Linux fleets.
  • Review Red Hat CVE status for applicable RHEL releases.
  • Check SourceForge bug 2754 for upstream handling and fix references.
  • Assess whether automated jobs pass untrusted data to gnuplot.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-476: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-31178 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.2CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.53.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.2Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-31178Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorgnuplotgnuplot, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6gnuplotunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7gnuplotunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gnuplotunknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-476 · source CWE mapping

NULL Pointer Dereference

NULL Pointer Dereference represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.