LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-31177: Gnuplot: gnuplot heap-buffer overflow on utf8_copy_one

gnuplot is affected by a heap buffer overflow at function utf8_copy_one.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-31177 is a heap buffer overflow in gnuplot’s utf8_copy_one function. The published impact is denial of service, not data theft or privilege escalation. It is rated medium by the source bundle, with local, low-complexity exploitation requiring a low-privileged local context. No cited source indicates active exploitation.

Executive priority

Handle in normal vulnerability management cycles, with faster attention for shared Linux systems or automated data-processing environments. Current evidence supports moderate urgency because impact is availability-only and no active exploitation is cited.

Technical view

The issue is classified as CWE-122 heap-based buffer overflow in gnuplot. The CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, score 5.5. Red Hat tracks potential exposure for RHEL 6, 7, and 8, but status is listed as unknown in the provided data.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where gnuplot is installed and usable by local users or automated workflows. The provided affected-version data is incomplete: gnuplot is listed with version “0,” and Red Hat product status is unknown. Confirm package presence and vendor-specific applicability.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates local access and low privileges are required, with availability impact only. There is no KEV listing and no cited source in the bundle reports exploitation in the wild. Treat this as a stability and service-disruption risk until vendor details clarify scope.

Researcher notes

Key gaps are affected upstream versions, fixed version, and vendor remediation status. The Red Hat entries for RHEL 6, 7, and 8 are marked unknown in the provided data. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond the local, low-privilege, availability-only CVSS characterization.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Red Hat and gnuplot guidance for fixed packages or official workarounds.
  • Inventory systems and workflows where gnuplot is installed or invoked automatically.
  • Prioritize remediation on shared systems or services processing user-supplied plotting input.
  • Monitor the Red Hat CVE page, Bugzilla, and SourceForge issue for status changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether gnuplot is installed on managed Linux assets.
  • Map installed packages to Red Hat or upstream advisories when available.
  • Review automated jobs that invoke gnuplot with externally supplied input.
  • Track whether vendor status changes from unknown to affected or fixed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-31177 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H1.83.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-31177Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorgnuplotgnuplot, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6gnuplotunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7gnuplotunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gnuplotunknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.