LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-30241: OS Command Injection in Web Interface in Multiple TP-Link Aginet Devices

Certain web interface components in affected TP-Link Aginet devices do not validate and sanitize user-supplied input properly before passing it to system-level command execution functions.  An authenticated adjacent attacker may inject specially crafted input to execute arbitrary operation system commands with elevated privileges. Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full device compromise.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A logged-in attacker on a network adjacent to a vulnerable TP-Link Aginet device could make its web interface run operating-system commands with elevated privileges. Successful exploitation could give the attacker full control of the device, threatening network availability, configuration integrity, and traffic confidentiality.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority network-device review. Immediately identify potentially exposed Aginet devices and restrict management access, then follow TP-Link guidance. Full device compromise is possible, but incomplete and internally inconsistent version metadata prevents reliable fleet-wide impact estimates from this bundle.

Technical view

CVE-2025-30241 is a CWE-78 command-injection flaw caused by insufficient validation and sanitization before web-interface input reaches system command functions. CVSS 4.0 rates it 8.6: adjacent-network access, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and high device confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure requires an affected TP-Link Aginet model, access from an adjacent network, and authenticated web-interface privileges. The supplied product metadata marks listed entries as default-unaffected and provides no usable vulnerable firmware ranges, so exact exposure cannot be determined from this bundle alone.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not identified as being in CISA KEV. Exploitation nevertheless has significant potential impact because successful command injection runs with elevated privileges and may fully compromise the device.

Researcher notes

The access prerequisites materially limit reach: AV:A and PR:L require adjacent connectivity and existing privileges. Impact remains severe because injected commands may execute with elevated privileges. The supplied affected records contain version "0" and defaultStatus "unaffected," so model names alone should not be treated as proof of vulnerability.

Mitigation direction

  • Consult TP-Link's advisory for confirmed affected models, firmware, and vendor-approved remediation.
  • Restrict device management interfaces to trusted administrative networks and authorized personnel.
  • Disable unnecessary management access paths where operationally feasible.
  • Prioritize remediation for devices reachable from shared, guest, or otherwise untrusted adjacent networks.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory exact model, region, hardware revision, and installed firmware for every TP-Link Aginet device.
  • Compare inventory details directly against TP-Link's current advisory before declaring a device affected or safe.
  • Confirm management interfaces are inaccessible from guest, user, and other untrusted network segments.
  • Review affected devices for unexplained administrative, configuration, account, or firmware changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-30241 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NTPLink

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-30241Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB810(US2) V1.0/1.6/2.0/2.60unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB810(EU1) V2.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB710(US2) V1.6/1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB710(EU1) 1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB610(US2) V2.6/2.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB610(EU1)0unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB610(CA) V2.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB410( EU1) 1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB210(US2) 1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB210(EU1) 1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB210 Pro(EU1)1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.HB210 Pro(US2)1.0/1.60unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EB210 Pro(EU1) 1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EB210 Pro(US1) 1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EB810v(EU1) V1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EX220(BR) V1.0/1.20/1.28/1.29/1.80unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EX220(BR) V2.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EX220(EU1) V1.0/1.200unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EX220(RU) V1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EX220(US1) V1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EX222(EU1) V1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EX222(KR) V1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EX222(US1) V1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EX520v(EU1)1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EX820v(EU1) V1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.EX920(US2) V1.6/V1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.XX530v(BR)v2.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.XX530v(EU1)0unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.XX230v(BR) V1.00unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.VX800v(DE) V1.00unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.