LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-27772: Uptrain vulnerable to remote code execution via `/new_run` endpoint

UpTrain is an open-source platform to evaluate and improve generative AI applications. In version 0.7.1 and prior, the `/new_run` endpoint is vulnerable to remote code execution via the `checks` and `metadata` parameters. Any user that has access to UpTrain and a valid authentication method may be able to execute arbitrary code in the context of the host running UpTrain, which in most cases will be the docker container as suggested by the documentation. As of time of publication, no known patch is available.

HighCVSS 7.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

UpTrain 0.7.1 and earlier can let an authenticated user run arbitrary code through the /new_run endpoint. Successful exploitation could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the UpTrain host or its container. The supplied sources report no available patch.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority exposure review. Immediately identify affected deployments, reduce access, and assess potential compromise. Prioritize externally reachable or multi-user instances. Because no patch was reported, risk reduction depends on isolation, access control, least privilege, monitoring, and continued vendor-guidance tracking.

Technical view

The /new_run endpoint improperly handles the checks and metadata parameters, enabling code injection classified as CWE-74. Exploitation is network-accessible, requires low privileges, needs no user interaction, and executes code in UpTrain's host context—typically its documented Docker container.

Likely exposure

Exposure exists where UpTrain 0.7.1 or earlier is deployed and an attacker can reach the service with valid authentication. Internet-accessible, broadly shared, or weakly controlled instances warrant the fastest review. The sources do not identify affected configurations beyond the stated version and access conditions.

Exploitation context

The CVSS 4.0 score is 7.4, and its vector records proof-of-concept exploit maturity (E:P). The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited evidence establishes active exploitation. Authentication is required, but any valid UpTrain user may represent a threat.

Researcher notes

The affected path is /new_run, with checks and metadata identified as dangerous inputs. The vulnerability boundary is authenticated access, not anonymous access. Host impact may initially be container-scoped, but actual consequences depend on container privileges, mounts, secrets, and network reach. The supplied evidence does not establish a patched release or active exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory UpTrain deployments and identify every instance running version 0.7.1 or earlier.
  • Restrict UpTrain access to trusted users and tightly controlled networks.
  • Disable or isolate affected instances when access cannot be adequately restricted.
  • Review vendor and advisory guidance regularly; no known patch was available at publication.
  • Minimize container privileges, accessible secrets, mounted files, and network permissions.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the installed UpTrain version using trusted deployment or package records.
  • Verify whether authenticated users can reach the /new_run endpoint.
  • Review authentication records and remove unnecessary, shared, or untrusted accounts.
  • Inspect application, container, and host logs for anomalous /new_run activity.
  • Check container mounts, secrets, privileges, and network access to determine potential impact.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-74: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-27772 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.4 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.4CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:PGitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

7.4High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-27772Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
uptrain-aiuptrain<= 0.7.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-74 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.