LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-26672: Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Buffer over-read in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in Microsoft Windows RRAS could let an unauthorized network attacker expose sensitive memory contents. Successful exploitation requires user interaction, but no credentials and low attack complexity. It affects multiple listed Windows client and server releases and does not enable data modification or service disruption according to the supplied CVSS assessment.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate confidentiality risk. Patch internet-facing or otherwise untrusted-network-accessible RRAS systems first, then address internal deployments through the normal security-update cycle. Escalate priority where exposed memory could contain sensitive business, identity, or operational data.

Technical view

CVE-2025-26672 is a CWE-126 buffer over-read in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service. Its CVSS 3.1 score is 6.5: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges, and user interaction required. The assessed impact is high confidentiality loss with no integrity or availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most plausible on listed affected Windows systems that run RRAS and permit untrusted network access to it. Actual risk depends on RRAS deployment, network reachability, user-interaction conditions, and update status. The supplied sources do not identify the exposed data or clarify every exploitation prerequisite.

Exploitation context

The supplied record does not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not identified as CISA KEV. The CVSS vector reports network access, low complexity, no required privileges, and required user interaction. No exploit procedure or observed campaign is documented in the provided sources.

Researcher notes

The record supports a buffer over-read and high confidentiality impact, but does not specify the protocol path, disclosed memory contents, interaction mechanism, or reliable detection indicators. Validate exposure through configuration, reachability, affected-build, and patch-state evidence rather than assuming every listed Windows host is exploitable.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the MSRC advisory and apply the applicable Microsoft security update to each affected system.
  • Prioritize affected RRAS hosts reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Restrict RRAS network access to trusted sources while remediation is pending.
  • Consider disabling unnecessary RRAS deployments after confirming operational impact.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory listed Windows versions and identify systems running RRAS.
  • Compare installed security updates with the remediation specified by Microsoft.
  • Verify whether untrusted networks can reach each RRAS deployment.
  • Recheck the MSRC advisory for revised affected-version or remediation information.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-126: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-26672 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C2.83.6microsoft

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-26672Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 150710.0.10240.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 160710.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 180910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 21H210.0.19044.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 22H210.0.19045.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 22H210.0.22621.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 22H310.0.22631.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 23H210.0.22631.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 24H210.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 16.1.7601.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)6.1.7601.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2008 Service Pack 26.0.6003.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)6.0.6003.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 20126.2.9200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)6.2.9200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R26.3.9600.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)6.3.9600.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201610.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)10.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)10.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202210.0.20348.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)10.0.25398.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202510.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)10.0.26100.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-126 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Over-read

Buffer Over-read represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.