LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-25785: JizhiCMS v2.5.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component \c\Plugins...

JizhiCMS v2.5.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component \c\PluginsController.php. This vulnerability allows attackers to perform an intranet scan via a crafted request.

CriticalCVSS 9.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-25785 is a critical SSRF issue in JizhiCMS v2.5.4. An unauthenticated remote attacker could make the server issue requests that help scan internal network resources. That can turn a public CMS into a bridge toward private systems.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent for any confirmed JizhiCMS v2.5.4 deployment. The issue is remotely reachable, unauthenticated, and rated critical, but current sources do not prove active exploitation or name a specific patch.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-918 SSRF in JizhiCMS v2.5.4, specifically \c\PluginsController.php. The published CVSS 3.1 score is 9.1 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations running JizhiCMS v2.5.4 are the relevant exposure group, especially internet-facing deployments that can reach intranet services. The source bundle’s affected-product metadata is incomplete, so teams should confirm product/version directly from asset inventory and vendor records.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says crafted requests can trigger intranet scanning through SSRF. It does not provide evidence of active exploitation, and the vulnerability is not marked as CISA KEV in the supplied data.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description, CVSS vector, CWE-918 classification, and vendor reference. Do not assume other JizhiCMS versions are affected without vendor confirmation. Avoid exploit reproduction on production systems; focus on inventory, configuration review, logs, and advisory tracking.

Mitigation direction

  • Check JizhiCMS and CVE records for vendor-confirmed fixed versions or guidance.
  • Prioritize reducing exposure of internet-facing JizhiCMS v2.5.4 instances.
  • Restrict unnecessary outbound network access from CMS servers where operationally feasible.
  • Increase monitoring for unusual server-originated requests to internal network addresses.

Validation and detection

  • Identify any JizhiCMS deployments and confirm whether version 2.5.4 is present.
  • Verify whether \c\PluginsController.php exists in deployed application code.
  • Review CMS and network logs for unusual requests toward internal address ranges.
  • Track vendor and CVE updates because affected-product and fix details are sparse.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-25785 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N3.95.2CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.1Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-25785Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.