CVE-2025-25692: A PHAR deserialization vulnerability in the _getHeaders function of PrestaShop v8.2.0 allows attackers to e...
A PHAR deserialization vulnerability in the _getHeaders function of PrestaShop v8.2.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted POST request.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-25692 is reported as a PHAR deserialization issue in PrestaShop 8.2.0. The claim is that an unauthenticated crafted POST request could lead to arbitrary code execution. Public evidence in the bundle is limited, so treat it as a credible e-commerce exposure requiring verification rather than confirmed mass exploitation.
Executive priority
Medium priority, rising to high for revenue-critical public stores on PrestaShop 8.2.0. The potential impact is serious, but the public record lacks confirmed exploitation and clear vendor remediation details.
Technical view
The CVE describes unsafe PHAR deserialization in PrestaShop 8.2.0's _getHeaders function, mapped to CWE-502 and CWE-77. CVSS 3.1 is 6.5 with network access, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. The bundle does not identify affected CPEs, prerequisites, patch commits, or fixed versions.
Likely exposure
Internet-facing PrestaShop 8.2.0 stores are the primary suspected exposure. The source bundle does not confirm other affected versions, specific modules, hosting configurations, or CPEs.
Exploitation context
The CVE text claims arbitrary code execution via crafted POST request. CISA KEV status is false in the bundle, and no cited source establishes active exploitation in the wild.
Researcher notes
Evidence is thin beyond the CVE description and a third-party GitHub reference. Validate the vulnerable code path and fixed-version status from primary PrestaShop sources before broad claims. Avoid assuming all PrestaShop versions are affected.
Mitigation direction
Inventory all PrestaShop deployments and identify any running version 8.2.0.
Check PrestaShop vendor guidance for patches, fixed versions, or configuration mitigations.
Prioritize upgrade or remediation for public stores handling payments or customer data.
Apply temporary WAF and access controls where business-safe while awaiting vendor guidance.
Increase monitoring for anomalous POST traffic to PrestaShop applications.
Validation and detection
Confirm deployed PrestaShop versions from application metadata and release records.
Review vendor repository or advisories for a matching fix or security note.
Check web logs for unusual POST patterns without replaying payloads.
Verify whether any compensating WAF rules are logging or blocking relevant requests.
Recheck CVE and KEV records for changed exploitation or remediation status.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-502: Code execution behavior lookup
Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.