LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-25256: An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability...

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM 7.3.0 through 7.3.1, FortiSIEM 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, FortiSIEM 7.1.0 through 7.1.7, FortiSIEM 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, FortiSIEM 6.7.0 through 6.7.9, FortiSIEM 6.6 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.5 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.4 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.3 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.2 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.1 all versions, FortiSIEM 5.4 all versions, FortiSIEM 5.3 all versions, FortiSIEM 5.2 all versions, FortiSIEM 5.1 all versions, FortiSIEM 5.0 all versions, FortiSIEM 4.10 all versions, FortiSIEM 4.9 all versions, FortiSIEM 4.7 all versions allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted CLI requests.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-25256 is a critical FortiSIEM flaw allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to run commands through crafted CLI requests. Successful exploitation could expose security data, alter monitoring, or disrupt the platform. Public technical and exploit material increases urgency, although the supplied sources do not establish active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as an immediate remediation priority, particularly for externally reachable or broadly accessible FortiSIEM systems. The combination of unauthenticated remote command execution, critical impact, and public exploit material warrants accelerated inventory, exposure reduction, vendor-directed upgrading, and compromise assessment.

Technical view

This CWE-78 OS command injection affects FortiSIEM 7.3.0–7.3.1, 7.2.0–7.2.5, 7.1.0–7.1.7, 7.0.0–7.0.3, 6.7.0–6.7.9, all 6.6–6.1 and 5.4–5.0 versions, plus all 4.10, 4.9, and 4.7 versions. CVSS 3.1 is 9.8: network-accessible, low-complexity, unauthenticated, and requiring no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure exists wherever an affected FortiSIEM version is deployed and its vulnerable CLI interface is reachable by an attacker. Internet exposure or access from untrusted networks materially increases risk. The bundle does not provide deployment prevalence or confirmed vulnerable asset counts.

Exploitation context

Public technical analysis and an exploit repository are listed, indicating that practical reproduction information is available. However, this CVE is not marked as CISA KEV in the supplied bundle, and no supplied source confirms active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The disclosed weakness is OS command injection through crafted CLI requests. The CVSS vector indicates remote, low-complexity exploitation without privileges or user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Public exploit material exists, but the supplied evidence does not prove real-world exploitation or identify a specific campaign.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory FortiSIEM installations and identify versions within the documented affected ranges.
  • Consult Fortinet advisory FG-IR-25-152 for supported upgrade targets and vendor-approved mitigation guidance.
  • Restrict affected CLI access to trusted management networks and authorized administrative systems.
  • Isolate and investigate affected systems if unauthorized command execution or unexpected changes are suspected.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm each FortiSIEM version using authoritative asset and platform records.
  • Verify whether the affected CLI interface is reachable from internet or untrusted network segments.
  • Review relevant logs and system changes for unexplained commands, processes, accounts, or configuration modifications.
  • After remediation, confirm the installed release falls outside affected ranges according to Fortinet guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-25256 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:H/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:H/RL:O/RC:C3.95.9fortinet

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-25256Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:H/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FortinetFortiSIEM7.3.0, 7.2.0, 7.1.0, 7.0.0, 6.7.0, 6.6.0, 6.5.0, 6.4.0, 6.3.0, 6.2.0, 6.1.0, 5.4.0, 5.3.0, 5.2.5, 5.2.1, 5.1.0, 5.0.0, 4.10.0, 4.9.0, 4.7.2unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.