LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-24695: WordPress Extensions For CF7 Plugin <= 3.2.0 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in HT Plugins Extensions For CF7 extensions-for-cf7 allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Extensions For CF7: from n/a through <= 3.2.0.

MediumCVSS 4.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is an SSRF flaw in the WordPress Extensions For CF7 plugin through version 3.2.0. An attacker with high privileges could make the website server request unintended resources, potentially exposing limited internal data or affecting integrity. The public sources rate it medium severity.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority WordPress plugin issue. It does not justify emergency response based on the provided evidence, but exposed sites should be inventoried, updated when guidance is available, and reviewed for excessive privileged access.

Technical view

CVE-2025-24695 is CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery in HT Plugins Extensions For CF7, affecting versions through 3.2.0. CVSS 3.1 is 4.4 with network access, high complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running HT Plugins Extensions For CF7 at version 3.2.0 or earlier. Risk is higher where privileged WordPress accounts are broadly assigned or where the web server can reach sensitive internal services.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or any cited active exploitation. Exploitation is constrained by high privilege and high complexity, but SSRF can matter when a WordPress server has internal network reach.

Researcher notes

Public details are sparse. The CVSS vector indicates authenticated, high-privilege, high-complexity SSRF with limited confidentiality and integrity impact. No exploit details, proof of concept, fixed version, or active exploitation evidence is provided in the bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Check HT Plugins and Patchstack for fixed-version guidance.
  • Update Extensions For CF7 when a vendor-supported fixed release is identified.
  • Disable the plugin if it is not business-critical.
  • Limit WordPress administrator-level access to trusted users only.
  • Restrict server outbound access to sensitive internal resources where feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the extensions-for-cf7 plugin.
  • Confirm installed plugin versions are above 3.2.0 when vendor guidance confirms a fix.
  • Review privileged WordPress user assignments for unnecessary access.
  • Check outbound web server logs for unusual requests to internal services.
  • Monitor Patchstack and CVE records for remediation updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-24695 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N1.32.7Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-24695Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HT PluginsExtensions For CF7extensions-for-cf7, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.