LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-23820: WordPress Content Security Policy Pro plugin <= 1.3.5 - CSRF to Stored XSS vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in thapa.laxman Content Security Policy Pro content-security-policy-pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Content Security Policy Pro: from n/a through <= 1.3.5.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

WordPress sites using Content Security Policy Pro through version 1.3.5 may be vulnerable. The issue is CSRF that can lead to stored XSS if a logged-in user is tricked into interacting with attacker-controlled content. Sources do not identify confirmed exploitation or a specific fixed release.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for public WordPress sites using this plugin, especially business-critical or high-traffic properties. The issue can affect page integrity and user trust, but active exploitation is not confirmed in the provided sources.

Technical view

CVE-2025-23820 is a CWE-352 CSRF issue in thapa.laxman Content Security Policy Pro. The title indicates CSRF to stored XSS. CVSS 3.1 is 7.1, network-reachable, low complexity, no attacker privileges, and requires user interaction with changed scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress installations with Content Security Policy Pro installed at version 1.3.5 or earlier. Sites not using this plugin are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector requires user interaction and no attacker privileges. The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation, so exploitation should be treated as possible but unconfirmed.

Researcher notes

The bundle identifies CSRF and stored XSS impact but does not provide root-cause details, affected endpoint names, proof of concept, or fixed-version metadata. Avoid assuming broader WordPress or plugin ecosystem impact beyond Content Security Policy Pro through 1.3.5.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Content Security Policy Pro and record installed versions.
  • Check Patchstack, CVE, and vendor guidance for a fixed release or official mitigation.
  • Update or remove affected plugin versions when vendor guidance supports that action.
  • Limit WordPress administrator exposure and enforce strong session hygiene.
  • Review recent plugin setting changes for unauthorized or unexpected modifications.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether content-security-policy-pro is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Verify installed plugin versions against the affected range: through 1.3.5.
  • Check whether any official vendor or Patchstack remediation has been published.
  • Review security logs for suspicious administrator actions around plugin settings.
  • Confirm compensating controls do not rely on this plugin alone.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-23820 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-23820Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
thapa.laxmanContent Security Policy Procontent-security-policy-pro, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.