CVE-2025-23810: WordPress Len Slider Plugin <= 2.0.11 - CSRF to Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Igor Sazonov Len Slider len-slider allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Len Slider: from n/a through <= 2.0.11.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-23810 affects the WordPress Len Slider plugin. A vulnerable site can be exposed to a CSRF-assisted reflected XSS condition if a user is tricked into interacting with attacker-controlled content. The impact is rated high, but the provided sources do not show active exploitation or a confirmed fixed version.
Executive priority
Prioritize this for any public WordPress property using Len Slider, especially sites with administrator activity. Treat it as a high-risk hygiene item: confirm exposure quickly, remove or update if guidance exists, and avoid assuming exploitation without evidence.
Technical view
The CVE records a CWE-352 CSRF issue in Igor Sazonov Len Slider, affecting versions through 2.0.11, that allows reflected XSS. CVSS 3.1 is 7.1 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, and changed scope.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites running the Len Slider plugin at version 2.0.11 or earlier. Internet-facing WordPress sites have the highest practical concern because administrators and users may browse authenticated sessions from normal workstations.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not cite CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The CVSS vector requires user interaction, so risk depends on whether attackers can induce a site user or administrator to visit crafted content while the plugin is present.
Researcher notes
Evidence is narrow but clear on class and affected range: CSRF leading to reflected XSS, CWE-352, CVSS 7.1. The bundle does not provide endpoint details, proof of exploitation, or a named fixed release, so validation should remain inventory-based and non-invasive.
Mitigation direction
Inventory WordPress sites for Len Slider and record installed plugin versions.
For versions 2.0.11 or earlier, consult vendor or Patchstack guidance for update or removal options.
Temporarily disable the plugin where exposure is confirmed and business impact allows.
Review WordPress administrative session hygiene and avoid browsing untrusted links while authenticated.
Validation and detection
Check WordPress plugin inventories for the len-slider package.
Confirm installed Len Slider versions against the affected range through 2.0.11.
Review web logs and security tooling for unusual reflected XSS or CSRF-related alerts.
Document whether the plugin is active, inactive, removed, or replaced on each site.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-352 · source CWE mapping
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.