LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-23801: WordPress Style Admin Plugin <= 1.4.3 - CSRF to Stored XSS vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FuzzGuard Style Admin style-admin allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Style Admin: from n/a through <= 1.4.3.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-23801 affects the WordPress Style Admin plugin by FuzzGuard through version 1.4.3. A tricked user could unintentionally trigger a change that stores malicious script in the site. Impact is limited but meaningful: visitor or administrator browsers may run attacker-controlled code within the WordPress site context.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure if Style Admin is installed. The business risk is site trust and administrator-session compromise through stored browser-side code, but urgency depends on confirmed deployment and vendor fix availability.

Technical view

The source describes a CSRF weakness in style-admin that can lead to stored XSS. CVSS 3.1 is 7.1, network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges required, and user interaction required. The bundle names CWE-352 and does not provide exploit details, affected endpoints, nonce behavior, or a confirmed fixed version.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with the FuzzGuard Style Admin plugin installed at version 1.4.3 or earlier. The bundle does not identify other affected products or platforms.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle, and no cited source here supports active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction and appears to rely on CSRF leading to persistent script execution.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The bundle establishes CSRF to stored XSS in Style Admin through 1.4.3, CVSS 7.1, CWE-352, and no KEV flag. It does not include PoC status, fixed version, vulnerable parameter, authentication context, or remediation detail.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the style-admin plugin.
  • Confirm whether installed versions are 1.4.3 or earlier.
  • Check FuzzGuard and Patchstack guidance for a fixed release or mitigation.
  • Prioritize removal or disablement where no business need exists.
  • Avoid relying on exploit testing as proof of safety.

Validation and detection

  • Review plugin inventory across production, staging, and managed WordPress hosting.
  • Record Style Admin version and deployment location for each site.
  • Check vendor or Patchstack records for fixed-version guidance.
  • Review recent WordPress admin changes for unexpected Style Admin modifications.
  • Confirm compensating controls do not replace patch status.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-23801 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-23801Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FuzzGuardStyle Adminstyle-admin, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.