LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-23768: WordPress InFunding plugin <= 1.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in inwavethemes InFunding infunding allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects InFunding: from n/a through <= 1.0.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-23768 is a reflected cross-site scripting issue in the WordPress InFunding plugin through version 1.0. An attacker would need a user to interact with a crafted request. Successful exploitation could run attacker-controlled script in the user’s browser, potentially affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability at a limited level.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for WordPress estates using InFunding, especially public sites. There is no sourced evidence of active exploitation, but the no-privilege network vector and potential admin-browser impact justify prompt inventory and vendor-guidance review.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-79 improper neutralization of input during web page generation in inwavethemes InFunding package infunding. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.1, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, and required user interaction. Scope is changed, with low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress installations using the InFunding plugin at versions through 1.0. The source bundle does not identify other affected products, CPEs, or whether the plugin is widely deployed.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cite active exploitation. Risk depends on whether attackers can convince site users, especially administrators, to open a crafted link or request.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The CVE and Patchstack entry identify reflected XSS, affected plugin, version range through 1.0, CWE-79, and CVSS 7.1. The source bundle does not provide vulnerable parameters, exploit details, patch version, or confirmed exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the InFunding plugin and installed version.
  • Check Patchstack and vendor guidance for a fixed release or official workaround.
  • If no guidance exists, evaluate disabling or removing InFunding from exposed sites.
  • Prioritize remediation on sites with administrator access from regular browsers.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any WordPress site runs InFunding version 1.0 or earlier.
  • Review plugin exposure on public-facing and business-critical WordPress sites.
  • Check whether Patchstack or vendor records now list a patched version.
  • Verify compensating controls without performing offensive browser payload testing.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-23768 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-23768Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
inwavethemesInFundinginfunding, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.