LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-23599: WordPress eMarksheet plugin <= 5.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Aarvansh Infotech eMarksheet emarksheet allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects eMarksheet: from n/a through <= 5.4.3.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-23599 is a reflected cross-site scripting issue in the WordPress eMarksheet plugin by Aarvansh Infotech. An attacker could trick a user into opening a crafted link, causing script to run in that user’s browser. Business risk depends on whether the plugin is installed on public WordPress sites and who can be targeted.

Executive priority

Prioritize if eMarksheet is installed on public WordPress sites, especially where administrators use the site frequently. The issue is high severity but requires user interaction and has no cited active exploitation. Treat it as a targeted phishing-enabled web risk rather than an automatic breach indicator.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-79 improper input neutralization during web page generation in eMarksheet. CVSS 3.1 is 7.1 high: network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, scope changed, with low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Version data is inconsistent: the title says <=5.0, while the description says through <=5.4.3.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites using the Aarvansh Infotech eMarksheet plugin. Public-facing sites have higher practical risk because reflected XSS can be delivered through links or redirects. Confirm installed plugin name, slug, and version locally because the provided affected-version metadata is inconsistent.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not indicate known active exploitation, and KEV is false. Exploitation requires user interaction, typically persuading a victim to open a malicious URL. Impact may include actions or data exposure within the victim’s browser session, depending on WordPress role and site context.

Researcher notes

Version evidence needs caution: the CVE title references <=5.0, while the description states through <=5.4.3, and the affected array is not useful. Do not assume a patched version from the provided sources. Validate against the plugin repository, vendor advisory, or Patchstack entry before closing exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the eMarksheet plugin.
  • Check vendor and Patchstack guidance for a fixed version or workaround.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if not business-critical.
  • Restrict administrative access and review suspicious links sent to site users.
  • Use web application protections as compensating controls where appropriate.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether the eMarksheet plugin is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and compare against vendor or Patchstack guidance.
  • Review web logs for unusual requests to eMarksheet-related endpoints.
  • Check whether administrators or privileged users received suspicious links.
  • Verify remediation after update, removal, or vendor-recommended mitigation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-23599 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-23599Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Aarvansh InfotecheMarksheetemarksheet, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.