Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This flaw can make a WordPress site using Bold pagos en linea run unwanted script in a visitor’s browser after the visitor follows attacker-controlled content. Business impact depends on where the plugin is deployed and who clicks. Sources rate it high, but require user interaction and do not show known active exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat as a high-priority WordPress plugin issue where the plugin is deployed, especially on payment-related or customer-facing sites. Urgency is lower than a no-click server compromise, but XSS can still support credential theft, session abuse, or brand damage if privileged users are targeted.
Technical view
CVE-2025-22793 is CWE-79 improper neutralization in Bold pagos en linea for WordPress, affecting versions through 3.1.4 per the CVE description. It is described as reflected/DOM-based XSS. CVSS 3.1 is 7.1: network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, user interaction required, scope changed, and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Likely exposure is WordPress sites with the bold-pagos-en-linea plugin installed in an affected version. The source bundle does not identify default exposure, affected endpoints, exploit prerequisites beyond user interaction, or whether the plugin is widely deployed.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle. Exploitation would require a user interaction condition under the CVSS vector. No exploit maturity, payload details, or confirmed in-the-wild activity are provided.
Researcher notes
Evidence is limited. The bundle labels the issue reflected XSS and also DOM-based XSS; both indicate browser-side script execution from untrusted input. The affected range is stated as through 3.1.4, while one Patchstack URL title references 3.1.0, so confirm exact vendor data before closing exposure.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory WordPress sites for the bold-pagos-en-linea plugin.
- Confirm installed plugin versions against vendor or Patchstack guidance.
- Prioritize remediation for public sites and administrator-facing workflows.
- If no fixed version is available, follow vendor mitigation guidance.
- Restrict plugin use where business need is low until guidance is confirmed.
Validation and detection
- Check WordPress plugin inventory for Bold pagos en linea.
- Record installed versions and compare with the affected range.
- Review vendor and Patchstack advisories for fixed-version status.
- Confirm whether public pages load plugin-controlled scripts or forms.
- Monitor security logs for suspicious user-targeted XSS reports.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2025-22793 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 7.1 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
7.1HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Source materials
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.