LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-2241: Hive: exposure of vcenter credentials via clusterprovision in hive / mce / acm

A flaw was found in Hive, a component of Multicluster Engine (MCE) and Advanced Cluster Management (ACM). This vulnerability causes VCenter credentials to be exposed in the ClusterProvision object after provisioning a VSphere cluster. Users with read access to ClusterProvision objects can extract sensitive credentials even if they do not have direct access to Kubernetes Secrets. This issue can lead to unauthorized VCenter access, cluster management, and privilege escalation.

HighCVSS 8.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Hive can leave vCenter credentials inside a ClusterProvision object after provisioning a vSphere cluster. Anyone permitted to read that object could obtain credentials despite lacking access to Kubernetes Secrets, potentially enabling unauthorized infrastructure management and privilege escalation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority credential exposure. Promptly scope affected vSphere provisioning environments, restrict object access, and coordinate vendor remediation and credential rotation. Infrastructure compromise is plausible if exposed credentials carry broad vCenter permissions.

Technical view

CVE-2025-2241 is a credential-exposure flaw in Hive, used by Red Hat MCE and ACM. Sensitive vCenter credentials remain accessible through ClusterProvision objects. Exploitation requires low privileges and read access to those objects. The supplied CVSS 3.1 score is 8.2, with high confidentiality and integrity impact across a changed security scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Hive, MCE, or ACM provisioned vSphere clusters and users or service accounts can read ClusterProvision objects. The bundle identifies Hive 1.2.4105-7735bf3 and affected Red Hat products, but does not provide complete MCE or ACM version boundaries.

Exploitation context

The bundle marks this CVE as absent from KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Abuse requires authenticated read access to ClusterProvision objects, but successful access could bypass Kubernetes Secret permissions and expose credentials with substantial vCenter authority.

Researcher notes

CWE-922 and the changed-scope CVSS vector are consistent with insecure storage exposing credentials across authorization boundaries. Important unknowns include complete affected-version ranges, credential privilege levels, exposure duration, and whether historical objects retain values. No exploit activity or detailed vendor remediation is established by the supplied bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Red Hat guidance and the Hive pull request for applicable fixed releases before upgrading.
  • Immediately restrict ClusterProvision read access to essential administrators and service accounts.
  • Apply the vendor-supported remediation appropriate to the deployed Hive, MCE, or ACM release.
  • Rotate potentially exposed vCenter credentials after remediation and investigate their prior use.
  • Review vCenter account privileges and reduce them to the minimum operationally required.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory deployed Hive, MCE, and ACM versions, then compare them with current Red Hat guidance.
  • Enumerate users and service accounts with read access to ClusterProvision objects.
  • Securely inspect current and historical ClusterProvision objects for persisted credentials without copying sensitive values.
  • Review Kubernetes audit records and vCenter logs for unexpected object reads or administrative activity.
  • After remediation, verify newly provisioned clusters no longer expose credentials through ClusterProvision objects.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-922: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-2241 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N1.85.8redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.2High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-2241Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorhivehive, 1.2.4105-7735bf3unaffected
Red HatMulticluster Engine for Kubernetesmulticluster-engine/multicloud-manager-rhel9affected
Red HatRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2rhacm2/cluster-backup-rhel9-operatoraffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-922 · source CWE mapping

Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information

Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.