CVE-2025-21964: cifs: Fix integer overflow while processing acregmax mount option
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cifs: Fix integer overflow while processing acregmax mount option
User-provided mount parameter acregmax of type u32 is intended to have
an upper limit, but before it is validated, the value is converted from
seconds to jiffies which can lead to an integer overflow.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This Linux kernel issue can let a local authenticated user trigger a serious availability problem through a CIFS mount option. It is not a remote internet-facing bug by itself. Business urgency is highest for multi-user Linux servers, shared hosting, build hosts, or systems where untrusted users can perform CIFS mounts.
Executive priority
Treat as a routine but real availability patching item. Prioritize shared Linux infrastructure and systems with local user access before single-purpose servers with tightly controlled administration.
Technical view
CVE-2025-21964 is an integer overflow in Linux CIFS handling of the user-supplied acregmax mount option. The value is converted from seconds to jiffies before validation, allowing overflow. CVSS 3.1 is 5.5 with local access, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact.
Likely exposure
Likely exposed assets are Linux systems using the CIFS client where low-privileged local users can invoke or influence CIFS mounts. Exposure is lower on single-user systems or hosts where CIFS mounting is unavailable or restricted to administrators.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show known active exploitation, and KEV status is false. The issue requires local low-privileged access, so it is more relevant for privilege-separated shared systems than for perimeter-only risk.
Researcher notes
Focus validation on CIFS mount option parsing and vendor backport status. The provided evidence identifies CWE-190 and upstream stable commits, but does not provide exploit details or distribution-specific fixed versions beyond the referenced advisories.
Mitigation direction
Apply Linux stable or distribution kernel updates that include the cited CIFS fix.
Check vendor advisories for exact fixed package versions for each distribution.
Restrict CIFS mount capability to trusted administrators where operationally feasible.
Review systems allowing untrusted local users or automated mount requests.
Validation and detection
Inventory Linux kernel versions and compare them with vendor CVE-2025-21964 guidance.
Identify hosts where CIFS mounts are enabled or routinely used.
Verify whether low-privileged users can perform CIFS mounts.
Confirm patched kernels include one of the cited upstream stable fixes.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-190 · source CWE mapping
Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.