LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-21834: seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe. The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp to control their syscall surface. Since uretprobe is a "kernel implementation detail" system call which is not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and there's very little point in forcing all userspace applications to explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes. Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration. Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn't expected to ever be supported in i386. [kees: minimized changes for easier backporting, tweaked commit log]

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This Linux kernel issue can crash processes being monitored with uretprobes when seccomp filters block the uretprobe system call. Docker default seccomp filters are specifically mentioned. Business impact is mainly availability and reliability for containerized workloads using tracing or profiling, not confirmed data theft or privilege escalation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted reliability patch for Linux container and observability environments. It does not have confirmed exploitation or a published CVSS score in the provided data, but it can disrupt monitored workloads and should be included in normal kernel patch cycles.

Technical view

The kernel made uretprobe a syscall, but seccomp allowlists such as Docker defaults did not recognize it. When a traced process encountered the return probe, seccomp blocked the implementation-detail syscall and the process segfaulted. The fix passes this syscall through seccomp without user configuration. The source notes x86_64 scope only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Linux hosts running containerized or seccomp-confined workloads where uretprobes are attached for tracing, profiling, observability, or security monitoring. Systems not using uretprobes or not running affected kernel versions appear less exposed based on the provided sources.

Exploitation context

No active exploitation is reported in the provided sources, and the CVE is not marked KEV. The scenario described requires uretprobe attachment to a seccomp-filtered process, causing a crash when the probe is hit. Evidence supports reliability impact, not weaponized exploitation.

Researcher notes

The key behavior is a seccomp policy mismatch around a kernel implementation-detail syscall. The public record lacks CVSS, CWE, and detailed affected range semantics. Validate against exact kernel stable commits and distribution backports before declaring exposure or closure.

Mitigation direction

  • Review vendor kernel advisories for patched builds containing the referenced stable commits.
  • Prioritize kernel updates on Docker or seccomp-heavy hosts using tracing or profiling.
  • Avoid assuming Docker seccomp profile edits are the long-term fix; source says kernel passthrough is intended.
  • Monitor affected workloads for unexplained segfaults during uretprobe-based instrumentation.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Linux kernel versions on hosts running Docker or other seccomp-confined workloads.
  • Identify observability, tracing, profiling, or security tools that attach uretprobes.
  • Check whether deployed kernels include the referenced stable kernel fixes.
  • Correlate process segfaults with uretprobe activity in containerized workloads.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-21834 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinuxff474a78cef5cb5f32be52fe25b78441327a2e7c, ff474a78cef5cb5f32be52fe25b78441327a2e7c, ff474a78cef5cb5f32be52fe25b78441327a2e7cunaffected
LinuxLinux6.11, 0, 6.12.14, 6.13.3, 6.14affected
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.