Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This is a Microsoft Office Visio remote code execution issue in listed Office products. Successful exploitation could let attacker-controlled code run with high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, but the source bundle indicates user interaction is required.
Executive priority
Schedule remediation in the next high-priority patch cycle, especially for users who receive external documents. Escalate only if new evidence shows exploitation.
Technical view
CVE-2025-21356 has CVSS 3.1 score 7.8: local attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required. The bundle maps it to CWE-122 and CWE-843 and lists official Microsoft remediation availability.
Likely exposure
Organizations running affected Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise, Office 2019, Office LTSC 2021, or Office LTSC 2024 installations should treat endpoints with Visio/Office capability as potentially exposed.
Exploitation context
The bundle does not support active exploitation: KEV is false and CVSS exploit maturity is unproven. It does support serious post-interaction impact if exploited.
Researcher notes
Evidence is limited to the bundle. The vulnerability is described as Visio RCE with heap overflow and type confusion classifications, but no exploit mechanism, file trigger, or workaround details are provided.
Mitigation direction
- Apply Microsoft’s official update for CVE-2025-21356.
- Prioritize endpoints with affected Office and Visio-capable installations.
- Check Microsoft guidance for exact fixed builds and deployment channels.
- Reduce exposure to untrusted Office or Visio files until patching is complete.
Validation and detection
- Inventory endpoints for the affected Microsoft Office product versions.
- Verify installed Office builds against Microsoft’s CVE-2025-21356 advisory.
- Confirm vulnerability scanners no longer report CVE-2025-21356.
- Check that patch deferrals do not exclude Office update channels.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCWE-843: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2025-21356 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 7.8 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C1.85.9microsoftVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
7.8HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityCVE reference, microsoft · vendor-advisory, patch
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Heap-based Buffer Overflow
Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.