LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-20393: Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager Remote Command Execution Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Spam Quarantine feature of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary system commands on an affected device with root privileges. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of HTTP requests by the Spam Quarantine feature. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with root privileges.

CriticalCVSS 10Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeHuman reviewedcritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a critical Cisco email security appliance vulnerability. A remote attacker who can reach the Spam Quarantine HTTP feature may execute operating-system commands as root without logging in. That creates a plausible path to full device compromise, disruption, or exposure of sensitive mail-security data.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for any reachable Cisco email security appliance. The issue is unauthenticated, remote, low-complexity, and root-level. Prioritize discovery, exposure reduction, and Cisco-guided remediation, especially for internet-facing systems.

Technical view

CVE-2025-20393 affects the Spam Quarantine feature in Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager. Insufficient HTTP request validation can allow unauthenticated remote command execution with root privileges. Cisco assigned CVSS 3.1 score 10.0, vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H. CWE-20 is listed.

Likely exposure

Exposure depends on whether affected Cisco Secure Email or Secure Email and Web Manager versions are deployed and whether Spam Quarantine HTTP access is reachable by attackers. Internet-exposed management or quarantine interfaces should be treated as highest concern.

Exploitation context

The provided sources describe unauthenticated remote exploitation through crafted HTTP requests. The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other cited evidence of active exploitation. Do not assume exploitation is occurring without updated vendor, CISA, or monitoring evidence.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description, affected version list, CVSS data, Cisco advisory reference, and CISA KEV lookup reference. No exploit code, active exploitation confirmation, or specific fixed-release details are present in the provided bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify affected Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Secure Email and Web Manager deployments.
  • Review Cisco advisory cisco-sa-sma-attack-N9bf4 for fixed releases or official mitigations.
  • Restrict external access to Spam Quarantine and management HTTP interfaces where operationally possible.
  • Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or third-party-accessible appliances.
  • Monitor Cisco and CISA sources for exploitation or updated remediation guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory AsyncOS versions against the affected version lists in the CVE record.
  • Confirm whether Spam Quarantine is enabled and reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Check perimeter exposure for Cisco email security HTTP interfaces.
  • Review appliance logs for unusual HTTP requests or unexpected administrative/system activity.
  • Verify remediation status against Cisco’s official advisory, not only scanner output.
Prepared
Reviewed
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Michael Williams reviewed this cited source version on .

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-20393 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
10 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA / ADP
Date added
Not provided

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
10CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.96Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

10Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-20393Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Secure Email14.0.0-698, 13.5.1-277, 13.0.0-392, 14.2.0-620, 13.0.5-007, 13.5.4-038, 14.2.1-020, 14.3.0-032, 15.0.0-104, 15.0.1-030, 15.5.0-048, 15.5.1-055, 15.5.2-018, 16.0.0-050, 15.0.3-002, 16.0.0-054, 15.5.3-022, 16.0.1-017unknown
CiscoCisco Secure Email and Web Manager13.6.2-023, 13.6.2-078, 13.0.0-249, 13.0.0-277, 13.8.1-052, 13.8.1-068, 13.8.1-074, 14.0.0-404, 12.8.1-002, 14.1.0-227, 13.6.1-201, 14.2.0-203, 14.2.0-212, 12.8.1-021, 13.8.1-108, 14.2.0-224, 14.3.0-120, 15.0.0-334, 15.5.1-024, 15.5.1-029, 15.5.2-005, 16.0.0-195, 15.5.3-017, 16.0.1-010, 15.0.1-035, 16.0.2-088unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.