LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-1782: Unsanitized input in language form field

In HylaFAX Enterprise Web Interface and AvantFAX, the language form element is not properly sanitized before being used and can be misused to include an arbitrary file in the PHP code allowing an attacker to do anything as the web server user. This flaw requires the attacker to be authenticated with a valid user account.

CriticalCVSS 9.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An authenticated user can abuse an inadequately sanitized language field in the HylaFAX Enterprise Web Interface or AvantFAX. The flaw may cause PHP to include an arbitrary file, potentially giving the attacker the web server user's capabilities and enabling serious data theft, alteration, or service disruption.

Executive priority

Treat exposed or user-accessible installations as urgent. Immediately identify deployments, constrain access, and obtain current vendor remediation guidance. The potential impact is full compromise within the web server account's permissions, despite the authentication requirement.

Technical view

CVE-2025-1782 is an authenticated, network-accessible PHP file-inclusion issue classified as CWE-94. Its CVSS 3.1 score is 9.9: low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where the affected web interface is reachable by untrusted networks or users. The supplied records name HylaFAX 1.2.0 and 1.3.0 and AvantFAX 3.4.0, but their version notation is incomplete; confirm exact affected builds with iFAX.

Exploitation context

The supplied sources do not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not identified as CISA KEV-listed. Exploitation requires a valid user account, so compromised credentials, excessive account access, or a malicious insider could materially increase risk.

Researcher notes

The source bundle describes unsanitized language-form input leading to arbitrary PHP file inclusion and broad web-server-user impact. It does not provide a fixed release, patch identifier, public exploit evidence, or unambiguous affected-version ranges. Avoid inferring that all HylaFAX products or versions are affected.

Mitigation direction

  • Check the iFAX advisory for supported remediation and fixed-version information before changing software.
  • Restrict the affected interface to trusted networks and authorized users while remediation is pending.
  • Review and revoke unnecessary accounts; enforce strong authentication and least privilege.
  • Disable the affected interface temporarily if safe restriction or timely remediation is unavailable.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory HylaFAX Enterprise Web Interface and AvantFAX installations, editions, exact versions, and network exposure.
  • Compare each deployment against the latest iFAX advisory because supplied version-range semantics are unclear.
  • Review authenticated web requests and server logs for suspicious language-field or unexpected file-access activity.
  • After remediation, verify invalid file references are rejected without PHP warnings, inclusion, or execution.
  • Confirm unauthorized and dormant accounts cannot access the interface.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-1782 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.9CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.16redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.9Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-1782Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ifaxHylaFAXHylaFAX, 0, 1.2.0, 1.3.0unaffected
ifaxAvantFAXAvantFAX, 0, 3.4.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.