LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-15642: Netskope Client Service Insufficient Access Controls

Netskope is notified about a potential gap in its Netskoped Client for Windows systems where a malicious insider with admin privileges can lead to bypassing the NSClient Tamper Protections due to weak Discretionary Access Control List (DACLs) on the service object and related registry keys,. * Product Name: Netskope Client * Affected Platform: Windows * Affected Version: All version below R138

MediumCVSS 6.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue affects Netskope Client on Windows before R138. A malicious insider who already has local administrator privileges may be able to weaken or bypass client tamper protections. The main business risk is loss of endpoint policy enforcement on compromised or misused administrator-controlled Windows systems.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority endpoint control issue. It is not described as remotely exploitable, but it can undermine Netskope protections where administrator access is misused or compromised.

Technical view

The vulnerability is an insufficient access control issue involving weak DACLs on the Netskope Client service object and related registry keys. The CVSS 4.0 vector is local, low complexity, high privileges, no user interaction, with high integrity and availability impact to the vulnerable system.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Windows systems running Netskope Client versions below R138, especially where users, helpdesk staff, or attackers can obtain local administrator rights.

Exploitation context

The provided sources describe a malicious insider with administrator privileges. They do not report active exploitation, public exploit availability, or remote exploitation. CISA KEV status is false in the bundle.

Researcher notes

Evidence is narrow but consistent: CWE-276, Windows-only, high-privilege local attack precondition, and affected versions below R138. The bundle does not name specific registry paths, exploit artifacts, or detailed vendor fix mechanics.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Windows clients to R138 or later where available.
  • Review Netskope advisory NSKPSA-2025-008 for vendor remediation details.
  • Reduce and monitor local administrator access on Windows endpoints.
  • Monitor for unauthorized changes to Netskope Client tamper protection state.
  • Use endpoint management controls to enforce client version compliance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Windows endpoints running Netskope Client.
  • Identify any Netskope Client versions below R138.
  • Confirm R138 or later deployment through endpoint management telemetry.
  • Review local administrator group membership on affected endpoints.
  • Check security logs for unexpected client service or registry permission changes.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-276: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-15642 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.8 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.8CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NNetskope

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.8Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-15642Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
NetskopeNetskope Client0affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-276 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Default Permissions

Incorrect Default Permissions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.