LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-15570: ckolivas lrzip stream.c lzma_decompress_buf use after free

A vulnerability was found in ckolivas lrzip up to 0.651. This impacts the function lzma_decompress_buf of the file stream.c. Performing a manipulation results in use after free. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-15570 affects lrzip, a compression utility, up to version 0.651. A memory use-after-free can be triggered locally in LZMA decompression. The reported impact is limited but includes possible confidentiality, integrity, and availability effects. A public proof of concept exists, but the provided sources do not show active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate operational risk. Prioritize systems that process untrusted archives or allow local multi-user access. The public proof of concept raises urgency, but the local-access requirement and lack of confirmed active exploitation reduce immediate enterprise-wide emergency priority.

Technical view

The flaw is in ckolivas lrzip stream.c, function lzma_decompress_buf. VulDB describes a use-after-free/memory corruption condition, mapped to CWE-416 and CWE-119. CVSS is 5.3 with local access, low complexity, low privileges, and no user interaction. The upstream project was reportedly notified via GitHub issue and had not responded at publication.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Linux or Unix systems where lrzip 0.651 or earlier is installed and used by local users, scripts, or file-processing workflows. Risk increases if untrusted compressed files are processed on shared servers, build systems, or automated ingestion pipelines.

Exploitation context

Sources state local access is required and public exploit material exists. There is no KEV listing and no cited evidence of active exploitation. The vulnerability is not described as remotely reachable unless lrzip is embedded in a service or automation that processes attacker-supplied files.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to CVE/VulDB records, a GitHub issue, public PoC attachment, project repository, and a Debian LTS advisory link. Do not assume a universal upstream fix from the provided data. Validate distribution-specific status before declaring systems remediated.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory systems for lrzip and identify versions at or below 0.651.
  • Check upstream and operating system vendor advisories for fixed packages or guidance.
  • Review the referenced Debian LTS advisory if using Debian-packaged lrzip.
  • Avoid processing untrusted lrzip archives until remediation guidance is applied.
  • Limit lrzip execution to trusted users and controlled workflows.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed lrzip versions on servers, workstations, containers, and build images.
  • Identify scripts or services that invoke lrzip on user-supplied files.
  • Verify whether package managers provide an updated lrzip build.
  • Track the upstream GitHub issue for maintainer response or patch status.
  • Document compensating controls where lrzip cannot be removed or updated.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
9

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-416: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-15570 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
2ADP providers
8Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R1.83.4VulDB
5.3CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R1.83.4VulDB
4.8CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:PVulDB
4.3CVSS 2.0MediumAV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR3.16.4VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

4.8Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-15570Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ckolivaslrzip0.651Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-416 · source CWE mapping

Use After Free

Use After Free represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.