CVE-2025-14831: Gnutls: gnutls: denial of service via excessive resource consumption during certificate verification
A flaw was found in GnuTLS. This vulnerability allows a denial of service (DoS) by excessive CPU (Central Processing Unit) and memory consumption via specially crafted malicious certificates containing a large number of name constraints and subject alternative names (SANs).
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-14831 is a GnuTLS denial-of-service flaw. A remote, unauthenticated party can present specially crafted certificates that consume excessive CPU and memory during certificate verification. Business impact is availability degradation, not data theft or system takeover, based on the provided CVSS and description.
Executive priority
Treat as a routine but timely availability-risk patch. Prioritize externally exposed and certificate-heavy workloads. There is no provided evidence of active exploitation or confidentiality impact.
Technical view
The flaw is CWE-407, excessive algorithmic complexity, in GnuTLS certificate verification. Certificates with many name constraints and subject alternative names can cause high resource consumption. Red Hat lists affected gnutls packages across RHEL 8, 9, 10 streams, and libtasn1 on some RHEL 8 extended support streams.
Likely exposure
Systems are most exposed where Red Hat Enterprise Linux services or clients use GnuTLS to verify untrusted or externally supplied certificates. Internet-facing TLS endpoints, certificate-processing services, and outbound clients that contact untrusted peers deserve review first.
Exploitation context
The CVSS vector is network, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. The impact is limited to availability. The source bundle marks KEV as false, and no provided source states active exploitation.
Researcher notes
Avoid assuming all GnuTLS deployments are affected beyond the listed Red Hat packages. The bundle provides affected package versions and advisory references, but not detailed fixed-version mappings in-line. Validate exposure by package inventory and vendor errata applicability.
Mitigation direction
Apply relevant Red Hat RHSA updates for affected RHEL streams.
Prioritize systems processing certificates from untrusted networks or external peers.
If updates are unavailable, check Red Hat guidance for supported mitigations.
Monitor certificate-verifying services for abnormal CPU or memory consumption.
Validation and detection
Inventory RHEL systems using affected gnutls or libtasn1 packages.
Compare installed package versions against the affected versions listed for each RHEL stream.
Confirm applicable Red Hat errata are installed through normal patch management evidence.
Review service dependencies to identify applications relying on GnuTLS certificate verification.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-407: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-407 · source CWE mapping
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.