LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-14601: vsDesk Task Scheduler OS Command Injection

An OS command injection vulnerability in vsDesk allows an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary operating system commands due to insufficient input filtering. An attacker can exploit this flaw to disrupt web server operations, expose sensitive data, or potentially achieve full server compromise. Apply patch from vendor https://vsdesk.ru/ . Versions 14.0101 and on have the patch.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

vsDesk’s Task Scheduler can let a logged-in administrator run unintended operating-system commands. Successful abuse could interrupt the web server, expose sensitive information, or compromise the server. The required administrative access reduces initial exposure, but stolen or misused administrator credentials would make the impact severe.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for externally reachable or sensitive vsDesk servers. Administrative access is required, so this is not an unauthenticated emergency, but the potential for complete server compromise warrants prompt patch verification, access restriction, and credential review.

Technical view

CVE-2025-14601 is a network-reachable OS command injection flaw caused by insufficient Task Scheduler input filtering. CVSS 4.0 scores it 8.6: low complexity, no user interaction, high privileges required, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The record maps it to CWE-676.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where vsDesk Task Scheduler is accessible to authenticated administrators. Systems with compromised, shared, or weakly protected administrator accounts face greater risk. The bundle lists versions 11.06.02 and 14.0101, but also states 14.0101 and later are patched; confirm the affected range with the vendor.

Exploitation context

The attacker must authenticate with administrative privileges, but exploitation otherwise requires low complexity and no user interaction. The source bundle provides no evidence of active exploitation, and the CVE is not identified as being in CISA KEV. Absence from KEV does not prove exploitation is not occurring.

Researcher notes

The record’s affected-version data is ambiguous: 14.0101 appears in the affected list while the description says 14.0101 onward is patched. Treat the precise boundary as unconfirmed until reconciled with vendor guidance. No exploit availability, observed attacks, or additional mitigation details are established by the supplied sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Confirm the affected version range directly with vsDesk because the supplied version data is internally inconsistent.
  • Upgrade to a vendor-confirmed patched release; the bundle states version 14.0101 and later contain the patch.
  • Restrict Task Scheduler and administrative interfaces to trusted networks and authorized administrators.
  • Rotate or investigate administrator credentials if compromise is suspected.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory deployed vsDesk versions and identify systems exposing administrative or Task Scheduler functionality.
  • Verify the installed build against current vendor guidance, specifically clarifying whether 14.0101 is patched.
  • Review Task Scheduler entries and administrative audit logs for unexpected commands or changes.
  • After updating, confirm the installed version and test normal scheduling through approved defensive procedures.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-676: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-14601 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NKaspersky

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-14601Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
vsDeskvsDesk11.06.02, 14.0101unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-676 · source CWE mapping

Use of Potentially Dangerous Function

Use of Potentially Dangerous Function represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.