CVE-2025-14290: IBM webMethods Integration Sever is vulnerable to server-side request forgery
IBM webMethods Integration (on prem) -Integration Server 10.15 through IS_10.15_Core_Fix2611.1 to IS_11.1_Core_Fix10 IBM webMethods Integration is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-14290 is a medium-severity SSRF issue in IBM webMethods Integration Server. An authenticated attacker may cause the server to send unauthorized requests, which can expose internal network information or support follow-on attacks. The supplied sources do not indicate active exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat this as a scheduled remediation item, not an emergency, unless the server is broadly accessible to many authenticated users or exposed partners. Prioritize patching where Integration Server can reach sensitive internal systems.
Technical view
IBM webMethods Integration (on prem) Integration Server 10.15 through the listed 10.15 and 11.1 core fix levels is affected by CWE-918 SSRF. CVSS 3.1 is 5.4: network exploitable, low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, with low confidentiality and integrity impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely in organizations running on-prem IBM webMethods Integration Server in the affected version range. Risk increases where authenticated users, partners, or compromised accounts can access the vulnerable Integration Server functionality.
Exploitation context
The issue requires authentication. The attacker could make requests originate from the affected server, potentially reaching internal services not directly exposed to them. The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of public exploitation.
Researcher notes
The public bundle does not identify the vulnerable endpoint, exploit mechanics, or precise fixed versions beyond the IBM advisory reference. Avoid assuming unauthenticated exposure. Validation should focus on installed fix levels, authenticated access paths, and server egress visibility.
Mitigation direction
Review IBM advisory 7273550 for affected levels and vendor patch guidance.
Apply the applicable IBM fix or upgrade path for affected Integration Server instances.
Restrict authenticated access to Integration Server interfaces to trusted users and networks.
Monitor server-side outbound requests for unusual internal scanning or metadata-service access patterns.
Validation and detection
Inventory IBM webMethods Integration Server deployments and record exact core fix levels.
Compare installed versions against the affected range in the CVE and IBM advisory.
Confirm vendor-recommended fixes are installed on every affected instance.
Review access controls for authenticated users who can reach Integration Server functions.
Check logs for unexpected outbound requests from Integration Server hosts.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup
Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-918 · source CWE mapping
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.