LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-14290: IBM webMethods Integration Sever is vulnerable to server-side request forgery

IBM webMethods Integration (on prem) -Integration Server 10.15 through IS_10.15_Core_Fix2611.1 to IS_11.1_Core_Fix10 IBM webMethods Integration is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-14290 is a medium-severity SSRF issue in IBM webMethods Integration Server. An authenticated attacker may cause the server to send unauthorized requests, which can expose internal network information or support follow-on attacks. The supplied sources do not indicate active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a scheduled remediation item, not an emergency, unless the server is broadly accessible to many authenticated users or exposed partners. Prioritize patching where Integration Server can reach sensitive internal systems.

Technical view

IBM webMethods Integration (on prem) Integration Server 10.15 through the listed 10.15 and 11.1 core fix levels is affected by CWE-918 SSRF. CVSS 3.1 is 5.4: network exploitable, low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, with low confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in organizations running on-prem IBM webMethods Integration Server in the affected version range. Risk increases where authenticated users, partners, or compromised accounts can access the vulnerable Integration Server functionality.

Exploitation context

The issue requires authentication. The attacker could make requests originate from the affected server, potentially reaching internal services not directly exposed to them. The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of public exploitation.

Researcher notes

The public bundle does not identify the vulnerable endpoint, exploit mechanics, or precise fixed versions beyond the IBM advisory reference. Avoid assuming unauthenticated exposure. Validation should focus on installed fix levels, authenticated access paths, and server egress visibility.

Mitigation direction

  • Review IBM advisory 7273550 for affected levels and vendor patch guidance.
  • Apply the applicable IBM fix or upgrade path for affected Integration Server instances.
  • Restrict authenticated access to Integration Server interfaces to trusted users and networks.
  • Monitor server-side outbound requests for unusual internal scanning or metadata-service access patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory IBM webMethods Integration Server deployments and record exact core fix levels.
  • Compare installed versions against the affected range in the CVE and IBM advisory.
  • Confirm vendor-recommended fixes are installed on every affected instance.
  • Review access controls for authenticated users who can reach Integration Server functions.
  • Check logs for unexpected outbound requests from Integration Server hosts.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-14290 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.5ibm

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-14290Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
IBMwebMethods Integration (on prem) -Integration Server10.15Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.