CVE-2025-12543: Undertow-core: undertow http server fails to reject malformed host headers leading to potential cache poisoning and ssrf
A flaw was found in the Undertow HTTP server core, which is used in WildFly, JBoss EAP, and other Java applications. The Undertow library fails to properly validate the Host header in incoming HTTP requests.As a result, requests containing malformed or malicious Host headers are processed without rejection, enabling attackers to poison caches, perform internal network scans, or hijack user sessions.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-12543 is a critical Undertow Host header validation flaw affecting Red Hat JBoss EAP and related Undertow packages. A malicious or malformed Host header may be accepted instead of rejected, creating business risk around cache poisoning, SSRF-style internal reachability, and session hijacking scenarios.
Executive priority
Treat this as urgent for externally reachable Java application platforms. The severity is critical, Red Hat has multiple advisories, and the business impact can cross trust boundaries through caches, routing, and internal service access.
Technical view
Undertow-core improperly validates incoming HTTP Host headers, mapped to CWE-20. Red Hat lists multiple affected EAP 7.x and 8.0 package streams, including eap7-undertow, eap7-wildfly, and eap8-undertow. CVSS is 9.6 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and changed scope.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely where affected JBoss EAP, WildFly, or Java applications using Undertow process untrusted HTTP traffic, especially behind shared caches, reverse proxies, or Host-header-dependent routing.
Exploitation context
The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. The described impact includes cache poisoning, internal network scans, and session hijacking, but the provided sources do not include exploit details or proof of weaponization.
Researcher notes
Evidence is strongest for Red Hat-packaged Undertow and EAP streams listed in the bundle. Some affected entries include non-Undertow package names under EAP 8.0; verify product advisories directly before drawing package-level conclusions.
Mitigation direction
Apply applicable Red Hat security advisories for affected EAP and Undertow packages.
Check Red Hat CVE guidance for current fixed builds and product status.
Prioritize internet-facing or proxy-exposed Undertow deployments first.
Review Red Hat errata before relying on compensating controls.
Reduce exposure of affected services where patching is delayed.
Validation and detection
Inventory JBoss EAP, WildFly, and Undertow-core usage across applications.
Compare installed package streams against Red Hat affected entries.
Confirm relevant RHSA updates are installed on each affected host.
Review reverse proxy and cache paths using Host-based routing.
Check vendor advisories again because the CVE was updated on 2026-07-15.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
7Timeline events
2ADP providers
17Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-20 · source CWE mapping
Improper Input Validation
Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.