LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-11731: Libxslt: type confusion in exsltfuncresultcompfunction of libxslt

A flaw was found in the exsltFuncResultComp() function of libxslt, which handles EXSLT <func:result> elements during stylesheet parsing. Due to improper type handling, the function may treat an XML document node as a regular XML element node, resulting in a type confusion. This can cause unexpected memory reads and potential crashes. While difficult to exploit, the flaw could lead to application instability or denial of service.

LowCVSS 3.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a low-severity stability flaw in libxslt, a library used to process XSLT stylesheets. A specially formed stylesheet can trigger type confusion during parsing, potentially causing crashes. The cited scoring indicates high attack complexity and required user interaction, with availability impact only.

Executive priority

Treat as routine patch management unless the organization processes untrusted XSLT/XML in business-critical services. Prioritize affected internet-facing or multi-tenant parsing workflows, but this does not currently justify emergency response based on the supplied evidence.

Technical view

The flaw is in libxslt exsltFuncResultComp(), which handles EXSLT func:result elements during stylesheet parsing. Improper type handling may treat an XML document node as an XML element node, causing type confusion, unexpected memory reads, and potential crashes. CVSS 3.1 is 3.1: AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where applications process untrusted or externally supplied XSLT/XML through libxslt. The bundle identifies affected Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, 8, 9, 10, OpenShift Container Platform 4 RHCOS, and Red Hat Hardened Images; RHEL 6 status is unknown.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation is described as difficult and would likely require a target to process attacker-influenced stylesheet content. Expected impact is application instability or denial of service, not confidentiality or integrity compromise.

Researcher notes

Focus assessment on stylesheet parsing paths and EXSLT func:result handling. The bundle supports denial-of-service concern through crashes and memory reads, but not code execution, data theft, public exploit availability, or active exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Red Hat advisory RHSA-2026:11015 for fixed package guidance.
  • Update affected libxslt packages through vendor-supported channels where fixes are available.
  • Restrict processing of untrusted XSLT stylesheets where business workflows permit.
  • Monitor vendor advisories for upstream libxslt and distribution-specific status changes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems, containers, and images containing libxslt or libxslt-main.
  • Compare installed package versions against Red Hat CVE and errata status.
  • Identify applications that accept user-supplied XML or XSLT input.
  • Review crash logs for libxslt-related parser failures in exposed services.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-843: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-11731 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.1CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L1.61.4redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.1Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-11731Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorlibxsltlibxslt, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Imageslibxslt-main, 1.1.45-0.1.hum1affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10libxsltaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6libxsltunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7libxsltaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libxsltaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libxsltaffected
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4rhcosaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-843 · source CWE mapping

Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')

Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.