A flaw was found in runtimes-inventory-rhel8-operator. An internal proxy component is incorrectly configured. Because of this flaw, the proxy attaches the cluster's main administrative credentials to any command it receives, instead of only the specific reports it is supposed to handle.
This allows a standard user within the cluster to send unauthorized commands to the management platform, effectively acting with the full permissions of the cluster administrator. This could lead to unauthorized changes to the cluster's configuration or status on the Red Hat platform.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This flaw can let a normal cluster user make Red Hat’s runtimes inventory component send commands using cluster administrator credentials. The business risk is unauthorized changes to cluster configuration or reported status in the Red Hat management platform. Treat this as high priority for environments using the listed Red Hat Runtimes Inventory or Lightspeed for Runtimes operator packages.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation for affected clusters because the flaw can convert ordinary cluster access into administrator-level actions against the Red Hat management platform. Focus first on production clusters and environments with many non-admin cluster users.
Technical view
CVE-2025-11393 is an improper proxy configuration issue in runtimes-inventory operators. The proxy attaches the cluster’s main administrative credentials to commands it receives, not only intended reports. CVSS 3.1 is 8.7: AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N. Red Hat maps it to CWE-441.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to clusters running the affected Red Hat Runtimes Inventory Operator or Red Hat Lightspeed for Runtimes 1.0 packages. An attacker needs standard user access within the cluster and adjacent access per the CVSS vector.
Exploitation context
The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The likely abuse path is a low-privileged cluster user causing the proxy to forward unauthorized management commands with administrator-level credentials.
Researcher notes
Evidence supports a confused-deputy style proxy issue: administrative credentials are added too broadly. Public details in the bundle do not include exploit code, fixed build identifiers, or confirmed exploitation. Use Red Hat advisory and Bugzilla for version-specific remediation details.
Mitigation direction
Review and apply Red Hat guidance in RHSA-2025:23236.
Identify deployments of the affected runtimes-inventory operator packages.
Restrict who can interact with the operator or internal proxy until remediated.
Review cluster RBAC for unnecessary standard-user access to this component.
Monitor management-platform and cluster audit logs for unexpected non-admin changes.
Validation and detection
Inventory clusters for Red Hat Runtimes Inventory Operator deployments.
Compare deployed package and image versions against Red Hat’s affected product list.
Check whether Red Hat’s RHSA-2025:23236 update is installed where applicable.
Review audit logs for management commands initiated by non-admin users.
Confirm standard users cannot reach or invoke the proxy component unnecessarily.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-441: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.