LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-10990: Rexml: rexml: denial of service via inefficient regex parsing

A flaw was found in REXML. A remote attacker could exploit inefficient regular expression (regex) parsing when processing hex numeric character references (&#x...;) in XML documents. This could lead to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS), impacting the availability of the affected component. This issue is the result of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-49761.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-10990 is an availability flaw in Ruby REXML XML parsing. A crafted XML document can cause excessive regex processing when hex numeric character references are handled. Red Hat maps this to puppet-agent in Satellite and Satellite Client packages. It is high severity because exploitation is network-reachable and unauthenticated where vulnerable XML processing is exposed.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for externally reachable XML-processing services and Red Hat Satellite environments. This is mainly a service availability risk. If exposure is internal-only and XML input is trusted, handle through an accelerated patch cycle rather than emergency response.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-1333 ReDoS in REXML handling of &#x...; XML character references, described as an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-49761. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. Source data lists affected Red Hat Satellite 6.16/6.17 and Satellite Client 6 puppet-agent builds.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on systems running the listed Red Hat Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Satellite Utils, or Satellite Client puppet-agent packages, or applications using affected REXML to parse untrusted XML. Actual risk depends on whether attackers can submit XML to the parser.

Exploitation context

No provided source or KEV status indicates active exploitation. The expected impact is denial of service through CPU exhaustion, not data theft or code execution. An attacker needs a reachable workflow that processes attacker-controlled XML with vulnerable REXML.

Researcher notes

The bundle shows duplicated affected entries and limited upstream version detail for CVE-2025-10990. Verify exact package NEVRA and vendor advisory applicability. Do not infer active exploitation; KEV is false and no cited source reports exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Red Hat CVE guidance and apply applicable RHSA-2025:17606, RHSA-2025:17613, or RHSA-2025:17693 updates.
  • Update REXML components according to the GitHub advisory and vendor guidance.
  • Restrict or reject untrusted XML where business workflows allow.
  • Prioritize externally reachable or partner-facing XML ingestion services.
  • Monitor CPU saturation on XML-processing services until remediation is complete.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Red Hat Satellite and Satellite Client hosts.
  • Check installed puppet-agent package versions against Red Hat advisories.
  • Identify applications using REXML for external or low-trust XML input.
  • Validate scanner findings against CVE-2025-10990 and the RHSA identifiers.
  • Confirm post-maintenance packages match vendor-fixed advisory guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
9

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1333: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-10990 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
9Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-10990Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorRed Hat SatelliteRed Hat Satellite, 6.17.5, 6.16.5.4unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8puppet-agent, 0:8.8.1-3.el8sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8puppet-agent, 0:8.8.1-3.el8sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 9puppet-agent, 0:8.8.1-3.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 9puppet-agent, 0:8.8.1-3.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9puppet-agent, 0:8.8.1-3.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9puppet-agent, 0:8.8.1-3.el9sataffected
Red HatSatellite Client 6 for RHEL 8puppet-agent, 0:7.34.0-4.el8sataffected
Red HatSatellite Client 6 for RHEL 9puppet-agent, 0:7.34.0-4.el9sataffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1333 · source CWE mapping

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.