LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-10005: Password Protect WordPress Lite <= 1.9.20 - Insecure Direct Object Reference to Authenticated (Contributor+) Password Protected Post Password Update

The PPWP – Password Protect WordPress | #1 Most-Reviewed Password Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.20 via the ppw_free_set_password AJAX action due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to update the password on any password protected post and subsequently access the content.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A logged-in WordPress user with Contributor privileges or higher can change the password protecting another post, then view its protected content. The issue does not require administrator access or user interaction, but it does require an authenticated account. The primary business risk is unauthorized disclosure of content relying on this plugin’s password protection.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation on sites containing sensitive protected posts or allowing numerous Contributor accounts. This is not an unauthenticated takeover or demonstrated actively exploited issue, so normal expedited patch governance is appropriate. Reduce unnecessary contributor access immediately while confirming the vendor-supported fixed version.

Technical view

CVE-2025-10005 is a CWE-639 insecure direct object reference in the plugin’s ppw_free_set_password AJAX action. Missing validation of a user-controlled key permits Contributor-level users or above to target password-protected posts outside their authorization. Reported affected versions are through 1.9.20. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3: network-accessible, low complexity, low privileges, no interaction, and limited confidentiality impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure requires WordPress sites running PPWP through version 1.9.20, password-protected posts, and an attacker-controlled Contributor-or-higher account. Sites without the plugin, without protected content, or without such authenticated access are not shown as exploitable. The bundle’s structured affected-version entry conflicts with its description, so inventories should verify product identity and version carefully.

Exploitation context

The bundle reports no CISA KEV listing and supplies no evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation would require valid Contributor-level or higher credentials. The vulnerability could matter more where contributor accounts are broadly issued, weakly governed, or compromised, and where protected posts contain commercially or operationally sensitive information.

Researcher notes

The supplied description identifies versions through 1.9.20 and the ppw_free_set_password action, but the structured affected entry lists version “0” with default status “unaffected.” No explicit fixed-version number is provided. Treat the textual version range as the reported scope while confirming it against vendor guidance and the referenced WordPress changeset.

Mitigation direction

  • Check current vendor guidance for the confirmed fixed release and upgrade when identified.
  • Restrict Contributor-level access to trusted users until remediation is verified.
  • Review whether sensitive content should rely solely on plugin-managed post passwords.
  • Disable or remove unnecessary Contributor accounts following normal access-control procedures.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the PPWP plugin and record installed versions.
  • Identify installations at version 1.9.20 or earlier for priority review.
  • Confirm which sites contain password-protected posts and assess their content sensitivity.
  • Review user roles for unexpected, stale, or excessive Contributor-level access.
  • Audit available logs and post settings for unexplained protected-post password changes.
  • After updating, verify the installed version against vendor guidance and repeat authorized access-control testing.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-639: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-10005 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N2.81.4Wordfence

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-10005Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineWordfence

    Vendor Notified

  3. Source timelineWordfence

    Disclosed

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
buildwpsPPWP – Password Protect Pages0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-639 · source CWE mapping

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.