Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Akınsoft QR Menü allows Cross Site Request Forgery.
This issue affects QR Menü: from s1.05.06 before v1.05.12.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Akınsoft QR Menü has a high-severity CSRF flaw in affected versions. A forged web request could cause unintended actions in the application, with limited confidentiality and integrity impact but high availability impact according to CVSS. Organizations using this product should confirm version exposure quickly.
Executive priority
Treat this as a near-term remediation item for any organization using Akınsoft QR Menü. The score is high, but current sources do not show known active exploitation, so prioritize based on confirmed use and internet exposure.
Technical view
CVE-2025-0610 is CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery in Akınsoft QR Menü from s1.05.06 before v1.05.12. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.6 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and high availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to Akınsoft QR Menü deployments running versions from s1.05.06 before v1.05.12. The sources mark other versions as unaffected by default, but do not describe hosting patterns or deployment prerequisites.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Public sources identify the vulnerability class and affected version range, but do not provide exploit maturity, observed attacks, or detailed abuse scenarios.
Researcher notes
Evidence is concise and version-focused. The CVSS vector states no privileges and no user interaction, while the weakness is CSRF; validate assumptions against vendor or government advisory text before deeper risk modeling.
Mitigation direction
Inventory Akınsoft QR Menü deployments and record exact versions.
Upgrade affected QR Menü instances to v1.05.12 or later where vendor guidance confirms applicability.
Review the Turkish government advisory for vendor-specific remediation details.
Prioritize externally reachable deployments for update validation.
Monitor vendor and government advisories for revised remediation guidance.
Validation and detection
Confirm whether QR Menü is present in software and service inventories.
Verify installed versions are not from s1.05.06 before v1.05.12.
Check public exposure of any affected QR Menü deployment.
Review application logs for unusual state-changing requests if available.
Document remediation evidence for each affected instance.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-352 · source CWE mapping
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.