LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-6047: GeoVision EOL device - OS Command Injection

Certain EOL GeoVision devices fail to properly filter user input for the specific functionality. Unauthenticated remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability to inject and execute arbitrary system commands on the device.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeHuman reviewedcritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-6047 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker run system commands on certain end-of-life GeoVision devices. For exposed cameras or video servers, this can mean full device compromise, service disruption, and a foothold for botnet activity.

Executive priority

Treat this as a near-term operational risk, not routine patching. The vulnerability is critical, unauthenticated, remotely exploitable, listed in KEV, and affects EOL security devices that may lack normal patch paths.

Technical view

This is a CWE-78 OS command injection flaw in specific functionality on listed EOL GeoVision GV devices. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8 because exploitation is network-reachable, low complexity, requires no credentials or user interaction, and can impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where the listed GeoVision EOL camera, LPR, or video server models are reachable from the internet, partner networks, or flat internal networks. The sources identify listed products and all versions, but do not establish exposure for any specific environment.

Exploitation context

Active exploitation is supported by CISA KEV status and Akamai reporting on Mirai-related exploitation of GeoVision IoT devices. The source bundle does not justify assuming every listed device is compromised, but internet-facing instances should be treated as urgent.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports critical severity, unauthenticated remote command execution, and active exploitation. Product coverage is limited to the listed EOL GeoVision models. The bundle does not provide exploit mechanics or a confirmed universal patch, so validation should stay inventory- and exposure-focused.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and prioritize listed EOL GeoVision devices in asset inventory.
  • Remove affected devices from direct internet exposure immediately.
  • Place required devices behind VPN, firewall rules, and network isolation.
  • Check GeoVision or TWCERT guidance for product-specific replacement or mitigation.
  • Replace or retire affected EOL devices where no supported fix exists.
  • Monitor for botnet, command execution, and unusual outbound traffic indicators.

Validation and detection

  • Search inventories for the exact listed GeoVision model names.
  • Confirm whether device management interfaces are internet-reachable.
  • Review firewall, NAT, and remote access rules for exposed devices.
  • Check logs and network telemetry for unusual outbound connections.
  • Verify segmentation prevents affected devices reaching sensitive systems.
  • Track CISA KEV handling through vulnerability management records.
Prepared
Reviewed
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Michael Williams reviewed this cited source version on .

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-6047 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA / ADP
Date added
Not provided

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-6047Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
GeoVisionGV_DSP_LPR_V2allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_BX1500allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_CB220allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_EBL1100allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_EFD1100allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_FD2410allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_FD3400allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_FE3401allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_FE420allunaffected
GeoVisionGV-VS14_VS14allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_VS03allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_VS2410allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_VS28XXallunaffected
GeoVisionGV_VS216XXallunaffected
GeoVisionGV VS04Aallunaffected
GeoVisionGV VS04Hallunaffected
GeoVisionGVLX 4 V2allunaffected
GeoVisionGVLX 4 V3allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_BX130allunaffected
GeoVisionGV_GM8186_VS14allunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.