LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-58352: Landray OA Unauthenticated HQL Injection via wechatLoginHelper.do

Landray OA contains an unauthenticated HQL injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to query arbitrary Hibernate entity classes by injecting malicious HQL syntax into the uid POST parameter of the wechatLoginHelper.do endpoint. Attackers can exploit the lack of input sanitization in the string-concatenated filter expression passed to the Hibernate findList() call to extract sensitive data such as administrator password hashes and, with sufficient database privileges, perform file-write operations enabling remote code execution. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-03-11 (UTC).

HighCVSS 8.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-58352 is an unauthenticated injection flaw in Landray OA. An external attacker may query sensitive application data without logging in. Sources describe possible exposure of administrator password hashes and potential code execution if database privileges allow file writes. This is high business urgency for any internet-accessible Landray OA deployment.

Executive priority

Prioritize within the next patch or emergency change window for any externally reachable Landray OA. The combination of no authentication, sensitive data access, public technical disclosure, and reported exploitation evidence makes delay risky, even though KEV is not currently listed.

Technical view

The flaw is HQL injection in the wechatLoginHelper.do endpoint, specifically the uid POST parameter. Unsanitized input is concatenated into a Hibernate filter expression passed to findList(), enabling arbitrary Hibernate entity queries. CVSS 4.0 score is 8.7. Public disclosures include technical details; avoid reproducing them in validation workflows.

Likely exposure

Highest exposure is Landray OA reachable from the internet or untrusted networks. The source bundle lists affected versions broadly, without a fixed version range or CPEs, so asset owners should treat Landray OA deployments as potentially affected until vendor guidance confirms otherwise.

Exploitation context

The source bundle states exploitation evidence was first observed by Shadowserver on 2024-03-11 UTC. CISA KEV status is false in the provided data. Public researcher posts and a VulnCheck advisory contain exploit-oriented technical details, increasing risk for exposed systems.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports unauthenticated HQL injection and high confidentiality impact. Version boundaries, vendor patch identifiers, and official mitigation details are not present in the provided sources. Treat exploitability beyond data extraction, including file-write based RCE, as dependent on database permissions and deployment specifics.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Shenzhen Landray vendor guidance for official patches or configuration mitigations.
  • Restrict external access to Landray OA until remediation status is confirmed.
  • Place OA behind VPN, allowlists, or trusted access controls where operationally feasible.
  • Review web application firewall rules for HQL or injection attempts targeting this endpoint.
  • Rotate exposed credentials if logs or indicators suggest successful data access.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Landray OA instances and confirm internet exposure.
  • Identify whether wechatLoginHelper.do is reachable without authentication.
  • Review application and web logs for suspicious POST requests to that endpoint.
  • Check for unusual database queries or access to administrator credential data.
  • Confirm installed version and remediation status with vendor documentation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-564: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-58352 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N3.93.6VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2024-58352Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Shenzhen Landray Software Co., Ltd.Landry Office Automation (OA)*affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-564 · source CWE mapping

SQL Injection: Hibernate

SQL Injection: Hibernate represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.