CVE-2024-58240: tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async
If we're not doing async, the handling is much simpler. There's no
reference counting, we just need to wait for the completion to wake us
up and return its result.
We should preferably also use a separate crypto_wait. I'm not seeing a
UAF as I did in the past, I think aec7961916f3 ("tls: fix race between
async notify and socket close") took care of it.
This will make the next fix easier.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2024-58240 is a Linux kernel TLS handling issue. The public record says kernel TLS decryption handling was corrected, but it does not provide CVSS, CWE, attacker requirements, or a clear business impact. Treat this as a kernel maintenance exposure requiring vendor patch tracking, not as confirmed active exploitation.
Executive priority
Set priority to monitored patch management. Escalate if affected kernels support externally exposed services or vendor advisories later assign meaningful impact. Current public evidence is incomplete and does not justify emergency response by itself.
Technical view
The fix separates synchronous, no-async TLS decryption request handling from async handling. The description says the simpler path should wait for completion and return its result without reference counting. It also notes no observed use-after-free in this change, likely due to an earlier race fix.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to systems running affected Linux kernel versions with kernel TLS code present. The bundle lists Linux kernel versions and stable commit references, plus Debian LTS and Siemens advisories, but does not identify specific distributions, products, or configurations beyond those sources.
Exploitation context
No active exploitation is supported by the provided sources. KEV is false, and the bundle gives no exploitability details, proof of concept, attacker position, or impact class. Any exploitation assessment should remain tentative until vendor advisories provide more detail.
Researcher notes
The record reads like a kernel TLS code-correction entry with sparse vulnerability detail. Avoid assuming UAF exploitation: the description explicitly says the author is not seeing a UAF and references a prior race fix. Validate against downstream advisories and commit inclusion.
Mitigation direction
Check your Linux vendor advisory for CVE-2024-58240 applicability.
Apply kernel updates that include the referenced stable fixes.
Prioritize internet-facing Linux systems and appliances using TLS-heavy workloads.
Review Debian LTS and Siemens guidance if those environments are present.
Track vendor release notes for any additional mitigation instructions.
Validation and detection
Inventory running kernel versions across Linux servers and appliances.
Compare installed kernels against vendor fixed-version guidance.
Confirm whether kernel TLS features are enabled or used.
Verify patched kernels include one of the referenced stable commits.
Document systems relying on Siemens or Debian advisory coverage.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2024-58240 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
7Source links
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
Aug 28, 2025, 09:40 UTC (UTC+00:00)
CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.