LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-58240: tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async If we're not doing async, the handling is much simpler. There's no reference counting, we just need to wait for the completion to wake us up and return its result. We should preferably also use a separate crypto_wait. I'm not seeing a UAF as I did in the past, I think aec7961916f3 ("tls: fix race between async notify and socket close") took care of it. This will make the next fix easier.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in Linux kernel TLS decryption handling received a critical 9.8 score, indicating potentially remote, unauthenticated impact. However, the supplied description mainly documents separating synchronous and asynchronous request handling and does not identify a demonstrated use-after-free or concrete attack outcome. Treat affected systems urgently, while recognizing that the evidence does not establish exploitation.

Executive priority

Start an urgent patch and exposure assessment because the supplied rating is critical and the vector requires no privileges or user interaction. Prioritize affected internet-reachable and high-value Linux systems. Do not infer an ongoing compromise solely from the score: no KEV listing or active-exploitation evidence is supplied.

Technical view

The Linux kernel change separates non-asynchronous TLS decryption requests from asynchronous handling. Synchronous requests wait for completion and return its result without reference counting. The supplied CVSS vector indicates network reachability, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, and high potential impact. No CWE, confirmed corruption primitive, proof of concept, or exploit mechanism is provided.

Likely exposure

The record identifies affected Linux kernel entries beginning with 4.13 and including listed versions through 6.8. Practical exposure likely depends on use of the kernel TLS decryption path, but exact configuration prerequisites and affected branch boundaries are not clearly documented in the bundle. Distribution and appliance backports make kernel version strings alone insufficient.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV status is false, and the supplied sources do not report active exploitation or a public exploit. The CVSS vector describes a remotely reachable, unauthenticated scenario, but the technical description says no use-after-free was observed and does not explain a proven path to confidentiality, integrity, or availability compromise.

Researcher notes

The description presents this commit as simplifying non-async handling and making a subsequent fix easier. It also says an earlier race fix likely prevented the previously observed use-after-free. Consequently, the precise vulnerable condition, security primitive, and version boundaries remain unclear. Validate branch-specific commits and vendor backports before declaring a host vulnerable or remediated.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply the appropriate vendor-supported kernel update incorporating the cited Linux stable change or its backport.
  • Consult Linux distributor guidance to resolve ambiguous affected and fixed version boundaries.
  • Review Debian and Siemens advisories when their packages or products are deployed.
  • If updating is delayed, request vendor-specific mitigations; the bundle names no standalone workaround.
  • Prioritize externally reachable systems using kernel TLS decryption.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory both installed and currently running kernel versions across Linux systems.
  • Determine which hosts enable or use Linux kernel TLS decryption.
  • Confirm the running kernel contains the applicable stable commit or documented vendor backport.
  • Compare package status against relevant distributor or product advisories.
  • Monitor authoritative advisories for revised scope or exploitation evidence.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
10

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-58240 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
9Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Linux

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-58240Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
siemens-SADPADP container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinux3c4d7559159bfe1e3b94df3a657b2cda3a34e218, 3c4d7559159bfe1e3b94df3a657b2cda3a34e218, 3c4d7559159bfe1e3b94df3a657b2cda3a34e218, 3c4d7559159bfe1e3b94df3a657b2cda3a34e218, 3c4d7559159bfe1e3b94df3a657b2cda3a34e218, 3c4d7559159bfe1e3b94df3a657b2cda3a34e218unaffected
LinuxLinux4.13, 0, 5.10.265, 5.15.216, 6.1.149, 6.6.21, 6.7.9, 6.8affected
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.